User:Hawkeye7/Final exam for wikilawyers

Instructions: Answer five questions.


 * 1) A Wikipedian sneaks into a portaloo at Wikimania and removes the contents left by Jimbo Wales. A home canning outfit is then used, and the results are sold on EBay as "Jimbo Wales's canned shit." Can an article be created about the product? Which of our policies and guidelines apply here? (20 points)
 * 2) An article about the flag of a terrorist group is up for deletion. Both the status of the group and the status of the flag are disputed. One side argues that we cannot just create articles on every flag claimed by every organisation. The other says that terrorist groups frequently have no official status. Which of our policies and guidelines apply here? (20 points)
 * 3) The cops knock on your door at 4am to inform you that you, as a Wikipedia admin, have 24 hours to delete an article on a notorious pedophile or you'll be thrown in gaol for contempt of court. Which of our policies and guidelines apply here? (20 points)
 * 4) A wikipedia admin has an affair with the wife (also an wikipedia admin) of another well-known wikipedian. ArbCom has said that bringing Wikipedia into dispute is grounds for desysopping, so the husband brings the case to ArbCom. Which of our policies and guidelines apply here? (20 points)
 * 5) A major contributor to articles on pornography is revealed to be under-age in the jurisdiction where she lives. Which of our policies and guidelines apply here? (20 points)
 * 6) An editor alleges that a well-known administrator is an employee of the National Security Agency. Which of our policies and guidelines apply here? (20 points)
 * 7) Two editors come to your talk page, seeking an uninvolved admin. You discover they've been going back and fourth for five cycles over three days passing and demoting an article as WP:GA because they disagree over the merits of a controversial article within the James Bond universe which, each time it is demoted, is renominated by a third editor, who actually wrote much of it. The article has just been demoted from GA for the fifth time, it is renominated as you try to get past the edit conflicts on your talk page. A glance at all three's block logs shows each has a single block for 3RR, with time ranges from two months to five years previously. The demoting editor's post at WT:GA has gotten no response, other than from the three of them, for three days. Which of our policies and guidelines apply here? (20 points)