User:HaydenRHN/sandbox

Article Evaluation
The content of the article is relevant to the topic, though it is very brief. It begins with a concise definition of a non-attainment area and cites the relevant law that the definition is based on. It provides links to other articles for several key vocabulary terms as well as the for the law. However, after this definition, the rest of the article is quite vague. It mentions that non-attainment areas "must implement a plan," but does not elaborate. Similarly, it describes the consequences of not doing so simply as "losing some forms of federal financial assistance." It does not source either of these claims, and they could both use significant clarification. ￼

The tone of the article is completely neutral, as it plainly states a definition and adds some vague details. ￼

The article cites two sources. The first, however, is not really a citation. It does not link to the source, but rather simply states the supposed source along with "In summary," which makes it unclear whether the author wrote the summary or if it was pulled from elsewhere. The second source is properly linked and is sufficiently detailed.

The article's talk page is completely empty with the exception of the information automatically created by associating the article with this WikiEdu class.