User:Hayeonc/Choose an Article

Article Selection
Please list articles that you're considering for your Wikipedia assignment below. Begin to critique these articles and find relevant sources.

Option 1

 * Article title:parasitophorous vacuole
 * Article Evaluation
 * This article currently contains only the lead section, which explains the low completion score (26). The lead section gives the one-sentence summary, a brief paragraph of what parasitophorous vacuole (PV) is, and another brief paragraph of how it is formed. I would add more sections for the structure, formation process, PV of various organisms, and more. Along with increasing the contents, it would need more pictures to help visualization.
 * The tone is neutral, but the article contains too many technical terms—which lead readers to other Wikipedia pages. On the top of the article, there even is a message informing that the article may be too technical for most readers to understand.
 * There are few sources since there is not much content. The link of one of the sources cited led to a page that does not exist any longer.
 * Stub class
 * Low completion score (26)
 * But low viewers per day (8)


 * Sources:https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1600-0854.2008.00728.x

Option 2

 * Article title:intracellular parasite
 * Article Evaluation
 * The lead section which only contains one-sentence summary need more summary paragraphs of the following subsections.
 * The "Types of Parasites" section only lists the types and give the hyperlinks to the corresponding Wikipedia sites. I would add at least a couple sentences introducing each type. Also, I would add more pictures considering the vast list of the types of parasites. I would develop the "Susceptibility" section more since it only has one sentence summary. I may use the same source but include more information. The article also needs more subsections in general too such as the life cycle of the parasites.
 * The article cited many sources, which was surprising to me considering the article does not seem to contain as much information. The couple sources I checked were from reliable websites such as NIH.
 * Start class
 * Medium completion score (40)
 * Medium viewers per day (7)


 * Sources:https://www.science.org/doi/full/10.1126/science.1094717

Option 3

 * Article title:rhoptry
 * Article Evaluation
 * The entire article only contains a single paragraph in the lead section and a quite detailed classification chart. The chart takes up the vast majority of the current article, but I argue it is not the most important section to know about rhoptry. So, for content, I would add more subsections such as the structure, functions, organisms that have rhoptries, and its interaction with other cellular parts. Along with information, I would add more pictures.
 * It only cited three sources, but it is understandable considering the size of the content. The cited sources were from reliable websites such as NIH.
 * Stub class
 * Low completion score (8)
 * Low viewers per day (7)


 * Sources:https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0169475896100302