User:HaylAtk23/Virtual reality in nursing/Cagos068 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

HaylAtk23


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:HaylAtk23/Virtual_reality_in_nursing?preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):
 * It's a new article so there is not a link yet.

Evaluate the drafted changes
''' Hi, my name is Caterina Agostino. If you have any questions about this feel free to message me on Slack. Was happy to read your article! :) '''

 Content Guiding questions: 

Is the content added relevant to the topic?

'I enjoyed reading this! I think you hone into some important topics to consider about virtual reality in nursing. All content is super relevant.'

Is the content added up-to-date?

'I think your content is very much up-to-date, especially considering that you added a section about impacts from covid. It really highlights the relevancy of your information.'

Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?

'In the Covid-19 impact section there is a reference to Sentinel U and Health Tech Magazine. I am wondering if you could describe the main ideas that those resources bring up about covid impacts as opposed to just linking it without actually talking about it? It sort of seems like you could remove it if you don't use it as a resource to describe some of the effects. But this is just a suggestion, it's not a big deal if people have to click the links to find out more about it.'

Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics?

'I am not sure if this was a requirement for the assignment.. but while your article does not address a historically underrepresented population, I think medical education and training is extremely relevant and important to update since healthcare is a large component of our social services. Also, with covid and its impacts, governments are realizing much more that healthcare staff are extremely valuable.'

 Tone and Balance Guiding questions: 

Is the content added neutral?

'The article is about virtual reality in nursing so it is expected that it will discuss how virtual reality is involved in the field of nursing. The tone is not necessarily positive or negative, so it is definitely neutral.'

Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?

'The only "claims" are how virtual reality can support learning, but it is not overly positive. The article also includes sentences describing the limitations of certain uses of virtual reality in training. I do not think the position is biased.'

Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?

Similar to the previous question there is nothing biased about the content of the article.

Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?

No, the article presents the "facts" about how virtual reality is involved in nurse training.

 Sources and References Guiding questions :

Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?

'Some content has one source, others have 2 or more. Perhaps some sections that rely on only one source (like anatomy, physiology and classroom enhancement) could involve an additional source that supports similar information or contests it.)'

Does the content accurately reflect what the cited sources say? (You'll need to refer to the sources to check this.)

From what I can tell, yes.

Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?

The sources seem very relevant to the literature on this topic.

Are the sources current?

Yes there does not seem to be a source earlier than 2010, and most of them were published within the last two years.

Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible?

'From the journals used, it seems all are within fields of research in medicine, psychology, and nursing which is relevant. From a scan of the authors names, there is some diversity among these authors!'

Are there better sources available, such as peer-reviewed articles in place of news coverage or random websites? (You may need to do some digging to answer this.)

'To the best of my knowledge, these resources seem reliable. Perhaps the two magazines I mentioned earlier in the content section (Sentinel U and Health Tech magazine) could be replaced or supported by peer-reviewed articles.'

Check a few links. Do they work?

'The links work! The video one too.'

 Organization Guiding questions: 

Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?

Everything is super concise, I did not feel like I was reading repetitive material.

Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors?

Not that I noticed.

Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?

'I particularly liked the organization of this paper, such that different applications for virtual reality in nursing are described in one section. The introduction was very useful for someone who is not familiar with health-related research and virtual learning.'

 For new articles only: 

Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject?

'I am not sure what this might look like, but I noticed that there were a few sources that dealt with virtual reality in healthcare and not specifically nursing which I think is very useful to have so that the facts presented are not just about a very specific field. Also some journals are not necessarily dedicated to just nursing or medicine, which I think adds variety of support for the content.'

How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject?

I believe for the assignment we need to include 10 sources, so maybe a couple more would be useful!

Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles?

'I think the structure of the article is similar to other wiki articles so it is organized appropriately. Virtual reality in nursing is quite a specific topic and could probably benefit from its own page.'

Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable?

'I think more links should be included! The first link is "vritual reality" which is great because if people need additional information they should read the actual page for the topic. But there are other terms used throughout that can be linked (if a page exists for them) like "simulation lab" (in shifts towards virtual reality in nursing education) or "remote classrooms" (in covid section), perhaps even "covid-19" or "global pandemic" could be links so that readers reading about covid-19 impacts could discover this page talking about virtual reality in nursing. "Nursing education" could be a link too. There are many different words that might be technical jargon that could be linked too!'

Overall impressions

Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete?

'This is a new article, so this question does not really apply, but this article is certainly pretty complete for a starting point! anyone can tag along afterwards.'

What are the strengths of the content added?

I think the examples of how virtual reality is involved in nursing are super relevant and one of the highlights of this article.

How can the content added be improved?

Apart from the suggestions I already made, I think it is great!