User:Hayleyhonescko/Choose an Article

Article Selection
Please list articles that you're considering for your Wikipedia assignment below. Begin to critique these articles and find relevant sources.

Option 1

 * Article Title: Frontierland
 * Article Evaluation:The articles contents are generally relevant to the topic; however, there are some value statements that are not entirely neutral. For example, the article states, "The land's long shoreline along the Rivers of America is considered a prime viewing location for the nighttime Fantasmic! show." The article should simply say that you can watch Fantasmic! from Frontierland rather than adding that the area "is considered the prime viewing spot." There are other similar value statements that need to be pulled from this article to make it more neutral.
 * Additionally, several of the statements regarding layout, exhibits/attractions, history, and more do not have citations. Although someone who has been to Frontierland in any of the Disney Parks could tell you these details without citations, as a Wikipedia article, there should be more citations for all the claims. Some of the articles are reliable primary sources, while others are blogs and websites that are secondary sources. It may be difficult to access primary sources from Disney, but Disney likely has lots of information on their website to cite and document that would be reliable (e.g. a map of Frontierland).
 * The talk pages does not have much discourse. The only comments deal with missing sources and some minor confusion. One of the comments ask about "rumors" written in the article. The unidentified user removed the claims since there was no evidence to support the claims.

Sources:
https://www.hongkongdisneyland.com/guest-services/tactile-maps/

[https://media2.tokyodisneyresort.jp/home/download/map/TDL_map_en.pdf?_gl=1*gj49z*_gcl_au*NzI2ODg3NTc2LjE3MDgzODQ3NDM.*_ga*MzU5MzEwMDI1LjE3MDgzODQ3NDM.*_ga_CW1JLMP4BH*MTcwODM4NDc0My4xLjAuMTcwODM4NDc0My42MC4wLjA. https://media2.tokyodisneyresort.jp/home/download/map/TDL_map_en.pdf?_gl=1*gj49z*_gcl_au*NzI2ODg3NTc2LjE3MDgzODQ3NDM.*_ga*MzU5MzEwMDI1LjE3MDgzODQ3NDM.*_ga_CW1JLMP4BH*MTcwODM4NDc0My4xLjAuMTcwODM4NDc0My42MC4wLjA.]

Option 2

 * Article title: Journal of Business and Technical Communication
 * Article Evaluation:The content for this article is scarce. There are only two sections and a small reference list. All of the content is relevant because there is not much to work with. The article could benefit from finding more information and resources to build the article more. The article is also written in a neutral voice.
 * Each claim is not given a citation. This article could benefit from more resources to develop more background and provide citations for each claim. The references that are listed seem to be missing some information as there is a message next to each one: " :  ignored
 * This article does not have any comments on its talk page.

Option 3

 * Article title: Faithfulness
 * Article Evaluation
 * The content of the article is generally relevant. The author uses some examples of faithfulness that may not be required for understanding of the topic. Additionally, the final sentence in the lead section seems to use some casual or informal language that takes away from the topic. Specifically in the use of "literally." It is an unnecessary intensifier that breaks the neutral tone for a moment.
 * For the short length of this article, there are lots of relevant resources. There is one missing citation, but every other claim has a citation. Each citation seems to be reliable.
 * This article mentions the practice of faithfulness in Jewish, Islamic, and Christian marriages.
 * The major topics discussed on the talk page are various proposals to merge this article with another (e.g. Fidelity, Faith, Loyalty).

Option 4

 * Article title: Shakespeare's Globe Centres
 * Article Evaluation:The content of the article is relevant; however, there is not a lot of information, so the article could be expanded upon. I recommend talking about the work of each location, pending there are sufficient recourses. This article is written in a consistent neutral tone. :There are not citations for every claim; however, the citations that are present appear to be reliable. :The talk page is quiet. There are no comments yet. :

Option 5

 * Article title: Jukebox musical
 * Article Evaluation
 * The content of the article is relevant to the topic and is written neutrally. There are a few redundant passages and lengthy sections; however, the article is generally cohesive. I would suggest eliminating some of the examples in the early section since a list is provided in other sections. This would reduce the length of the article, making it easier to read. Additionally, one section has the list in a table format divided by decades and the other sections are in a list. I recommend using either a table or a list but both is confusing.  Most of the claims have citations; however, the main flaw with this article is the lack of substantial primary sources. I am not sure what would be a good primary source for this topic; however, this article would benefit from more substantial primary sources.   The discussion on the talk page is mainly debating whether specific musicals should be classified as jukebox musicals or not. There seems to be confusion on the talk page about the definition. Perhaps there needs to be a clearer defintion in the article to clear up some of this confusion.