User:Hazelmw/It Starts with Us/Kaitievivian Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Hazelmw


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Hazelmw/It_Starts_with_Us?veaction=edit&preload=Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

It Starts with Us

Evaluate the drafted changes

 * Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?
 * they did a really good job doing this.
 * Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * Yes, no it doesn't just summarizing the plot
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * I feel like I just read the book. In just reading the plot so its not really over presented but maybe leave us hanging
 * Check the citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?
 * cannot check due to no references
 * Is each fact supported by an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?
 * Their are no references listed yet.
 * Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that should be added?
 * Is each fact supported by an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?
 * Their are no references listed yet.
 * Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that should be added?
 * Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that should be added?
 * Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that should be added?

There are no references yet to dictate this