User:Hazelsvest/The Trojan Women/LegoOrchid Peer Review

Lead:

The lead seems to be mostly restructuring of the existing lead in the article. This could be condensed or even split into two sections. Good introduction of the plot but it may not be necessary because there is a large section int he article on the plot of the play. The part that you have crossed through I am in support of removing from the article because of opinionated speech. The information you have added seems to be relevant and up to date.

Content:

Themes and Significance

Good choice to add a section on themes and significance. It is clear that you are aware of your need for sources and expansion on this section. Be mindful of non-neutral speech, you could also label this section as critical analysis and may be able to get away with more subjective sentences.

Tone and Balance:

Overall, the tone seems to be good except for in the themes section.

Organization:

I like the addition of the themes section. The first chunk of text could be broken up into two sections but overall everything flows well together.

Sources and References:

Although you noted that you are having a hard time finding sources, the ones listed seem to be relevant and up to date. Looking for more in the themes section is a good idea, that is definitely an area that would improve the article

Images and Media:

You noted how the article would improve with additional images, perhaps one of this play on the stage?

Overall, it is clear where you are headed with this article. Good work so far, it seems you are aware of what you need to add:)

General info
(provide username)
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)