User:Hbccas/Claudia E. Zapata/Jording Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Hbbcas


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Claudia E. Zapata


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Claudia E. Zapata

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)


 * Lead
 * Content
 * All of the information provided seems to be relevant to the topic and is up to date
 * Tone and Balance
 * Everything is neutral
 * Sources and References
 * The sources links work and the information aligns with these sources
 * Organization
 * everything is well organized
 * Images and Media
 * There are no images
 * For New Articles only section
 * Met all requirements for new articles
 * Overall impressions
 * I think overall, this is a great article, it meets all the wikipedia criteria.