User:Hderm/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Carbon_Action_Partnership

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
Climate action is an interesting topic and I have never heard of this particular organization before so I wanted to learn more about it. At first glance the article is little short but it gets to the point and explains the goals, membership, history, etc. in a brisk fashion.

Lead Section
The lead section does a good job of summarizing the main topic of the article. I'm not sure of the importance of the quote by Arnold Schwarzenegger, perhaps it could be placed somewhere else in the article as it is not really necessary for it to be in the lead. Besides that I think the lead is well written and concise.

Content
The content of the article is well cited and organized in clear and understandable way. I especially like the dedicated status report section which allows the user to follow directly to the organizations website. The current members list has not been updated since 2019, although that may mean no new members have joined or left, it should be updated to 2022.

Tone and Balance
The tone of the article is neutral and is reporting the structure, mission statement and history of the organization in a non-biased and descriptive way. I did not find any sentences taking position on the quality of the program, nor did I pick up on any politically biased tones.

Sources and References
There is variety in the sources, however about half come from the website of the organization itself. Some of the links were dead and did not reach the website intended, might be an issue on my end but I tried a few times. There are a few PDF file references that do open and they generally support the statements made in the article in the relevant section.

Organization and Writing Quality
The organization and writing quality are high. The article is organized in a straightforward and easily understandable structure. I did not find any major grammatical errors and I think the writing style is academic in nature and very concise yet rich with information.

Image and Media
There are no images or media in this article. Perhaps adding the official symbol of the organization could be useful for the reader and help identify them visually.

Talk Page Discussion
Ha! It seems the people in the talk page were one step ahead of me. There is a submission for review to replace one of the dead links and curiously another one that initiated the deletion of the logo of ICAP. This article is part of 3 WikiProjects including WikiProject Environments, WikiProject International Relations, and WikiProject Climate Change.

Overall Impressions
I think overall this is a good article considering the topic. I would probably like to see more images because the article lacks them entirely. The references need to be updated to remove dead links and perhaps the Arnold quote in the beginning can be removed or placed elsewhere in the article.