User:HeatIsCool/sandbox/7

=CSD: "D" series, A10 to G9, "Office actions" to "G0" and a few more= Just exactly long ago have we refined the speedy deletion process? Seven years? "Whatever", because I think it's about time it gets refined again. Here are some of my proposed changes:
 * 1) Create a "D" series. This would cover disambiguation pages. I will also propose several reasons in accordance to policy:
 * D1: Underpopulated disambiguation page: This would cover any disambiguation page that links to zero pages, only one page, or any page with two links: one that links to, and another that links to in which the title of the page is . In the case of the second latter, the page must satisfy both conditions.
 * If the tagger just inserts db-d1, they would be asked to add a more specific template: db-zero, db-one, or db-two.
 * What's so interesting about it is that it already exists as one of many scopes of G6.
 * D2: Inappropriate cross-namespace disambiguation: This covers any disambiguation page that unnecessarily directs readers across namespaces, or leads readers to any page in the "User:" or "File:" namespace, as long as the page would otherwise meet (proposed) criterion D1.
 * What's so interesting about it is that it already exists under a different scope as R2.
 * D3: Implausible typos/misnomers: This covers any disambiguation page that has title that is at least only remotely related with the subjects it links to, as long as the page would otherwise meet (proposed) criterion D1.
 * What's so interesting about it is that it already exists under a different scope as R3.
 * D4: Inappropriate/unspecified links: This covers any disambiguation page that contains external links, and/or links to articles that don't exist, have been deleted, or are themselves being tagged for speedy deletion, as long as the page would otherwise meet (proposed) criterion D1.
 * If the tagger just inserts db-d4, they would be asked if a more specific template is appropriate: db-external or db-redlink.
 * What's so interesting about it is that part of it already partially exists as G8. It will not, however, affect G8 in any way.

Move "Office actions" to criterion G0 (G-Zero). My reasoning? As far as I'm concerned, office actions that involve speedily deleting a page isn't technically speedy deletion. It can just be understood as a technical deletion outside the scope of G6. After all, it's not a form of deletion that users or even stalwart administrators can even control. Also, I would like to add another general criterion in the place of G9, one that becomes common every now-and-then and already partially exists. That brings us to... Create a general criterion for duplicate articles. While this already exists as A10 and T3, I don't see why it can't work with other namespaces, such as category or redirect. But as that leaves only T2 as a valid criterion under templates, I'm going to propose yet another. That brings us to... Create a template criterion for templates of no encyclopedic value. 