User:HeatherSchimming/William Augustus Bowles/Sgs052901 Peer Review

General info
HeatherSchimming
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:HeatherSchimming/William Augustus BowlesB
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * William Augustus Bowles
 * William Augustus Bowles

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead: Strong lead. Concise direct and clear. Gives overview of article and highlights the major events of Bowles life and describes him on general terms, while pointing the reader to the notability of the article. Great lead! ￼

Content: Early life section is super interesting and made me want to keep reading more! Second section is also very strong and interesting. Are there any names of the military events he was a part of? Maybe adding years in this section at the bottom would also be helpful! The unfinished sections that are being added to also seem great. This is such a great start! ￼

Tone and Balance: The tone is very balanced and informative. The article is representative of all viewpoints, and there are not persuasive elements.

Sources and References: Great historical sources, with a large number of primary sources embedded. The articles also vary over the years they were published but are seemingly updated! Very reliable and directly linked sources.

Organization: The article is concise, and its structure and organization are very effective. I see no grammatical or spelling errors, and it is very easy to read. ￼

Images and Media: The current map/drawing of the bay of Pensacola from the 18th century looks great, and the portrait at the top is awesome. The images and media enhance the article and are interesting. They are visually appealing and well captioned.