User:HebinCMN2160/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
(Provide a link to the article here.)

Communications management

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

My idea was to choose an article related to my major and ongoing courses, so I searched for communication. Then I chose this article because its title reminded me of some concepts and knowledge I had learned in a course named Organizational Communication. The first impression is that the page looks clean and organized even though it doesn't have many complex contents.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

I think the Lead section can be described as concise and powerful, but some of the topics are a little verbose and hard to understand. The categorization of "content" or subheadings may seem unprofessional, as various subheadings are listed in the same rank even though some shouldn't be. Secondly, this article does not use any images, which is not reasonable since pictures can give a simple and intuitive expression to readers who are not familiar with this concept. Furthermore, my opinion is that the academic sources cited in this article are not enough and comprehensive. There is still a phenomenon that some references cannot be opened successfully.