User:Heejaens/sandbox

Article Evalualtion

 * I think that the article could have been better written. There are parts where the meaning of a sentence could be ambiguous and the writer(s) seem to distract away from the original point they are talking about. While not completely straying from the topic of human migration there were some parts where the author moves onto a different subsection within the topic that is also mentioned later on in the article which leads to the subsections being merged/not completely differentiated which may make it difficult for readers to find the specific information they want or need from the article. In the parts where the article talks about numbers and statistics of migration I think it would have been helpful if there were more tables or graphs to give a more visual understanding of the numbers instead of just reading all of them. I also felt like some of the information was not provided with enough evidence which gave less credibility to the information. Some of the hyperlinks that I assume were supposed to lead to different Wikipedia articles showed a blank or nonexistent page. (e.g. "See also: Dual Labor Market and studies")
 * Overall however the article's writer(s) does seem to have a neutral standpoint on the subject of human migration. It gives a broad view of how migration trends are throughout the globe without focusing on a certain group or example. The talk page shows that a lot of readers think that the article should definitely undergo revision as there is a lot of outdated information as well as some questions that need to be answered, such as "does out-migration merely mean emigration". The article is a level 3 vital article and is rated C-class, and is part of 7 Wikiprojects. I think that because of how relevant it is to several projects the revisions suggested must be made to provide a more reliable source of information to an obviously broad audience.
 * The wiki page differs on the topic of human migration than how we learned about it in class because it stands on a fairly straight viewpoint on the topic while in class there are various different views on the subject as in class there are discussions that occur among students from different background with different levels of knowledge on the topic which can lead to some interesting opinions.