User:HegelianMonkey/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Forehead kiss

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I am a bit of a forehead kiss connoisseur myself and was curious to see the ways in which forehead kisses were linked to anthropology as a discipline.

Evaluate the article
The lead section is the strongest point in the text. It is missing a few citations, but is presented concisely, clearly, and in a neutral manner.

In terms of content, only the lead section has any relevant, clearly-sourced information. A short section on "Media" has only three sentences, none of which contain a citation. Clearer evidence in that section would greatly strengthen said paragraph, as well as the overall argument. More content within media would broaden the discussion on forehead kisses. Additionally, there is no clear tie of forehead kisses to anthropology.... I am not sure why that is.

The sourcing is weak in this text. The two provided links do not work. Although the first text seems related, numbers 2 and 3 seem much broader. To fix this article, all sources would need to be reanalyzed and likely altered.

The writing of the article itself is decent; it is clear and coherent. More examples would be helpful in the media section.

One image is present in the text; the caption could be more detailed. However, it does follow copyright guidelines. I would not call the image visually appealing, but it is fine and shows a forehead kiss.

There is no conversation occurring in the talk page. The user is linked to a wiki-ed class, but no other information is present on the page.

This is a stub article. It is underdeveloped, undersourced, and needs far more detail to be useful.