User:Heidi90189676415M/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Center for Art and Archaeology

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose to evaluate this article because it sounded interesting and was within the "Research institutes by academic discipline" subcategory.

Evaluate the article
The lead section for the articles selected is good. It is not too detailed, it is obvious what the topic is, and it does not have any unnecessary information. However, the article does discuss things, like the history of the building as well as what is within it, which are not mentioned in the lead section. The content of the work is also fairly decent. All of the content is directed towards the topic of interest and does fill an equity gap. However, as shown by the warning notice, more citations are needed, and it may be possible to find more information by conducting more research. The tone should not be changed because it is not biased. The list of sources utilized could be improved by finding more current works through research. The first link listed in the references has an error, so I cannot read all of it. Yet, the second link is still working. The information within the article does seem to be based on the sources, although they may not be not as current as one may desire. Additionally, they do provide information on the topic of interest, but the authors are unknown. As for other sources, there are a few that can be found using Google. The article has a good structure and writing style. There may, however, be one grammatical error in the first and last sentences of the fourth paragraph. There are no images within the work, and it does not seem like there are any discussions on the "Talk" page. However, the article is in "WikiProject India." Although this has not been a subject within our class, it does relate to research. One difference is that the article is more faced on facts regarding the topic as opposed to research conducted. The article is rated to be "Stub-class." One positive aspect of the work is that it has a clear organization. One negative aspect is that it does not have more recent sources. I would say that the article is underdeveloped, but it can be enhanced by conducting more research using more current texts. --~ - Heidi90189676415M