User:HelenaA12/Teresa Marshall/Jguti174 Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info
Whose work are you reviewing? (provide username)

I am reviewing HelenaA12 's work


 * Link to draft you're reviewing: User:HelenaA12/Teresa Marshall

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer?

The lead has not been updated at all


 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?

The lead does not include an effective introductory sentence


 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?

The lead does not include a brief description of the article's major sections


 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?

The lead includes no information at all


 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?

N/A

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic?

There is no content added


 * Is the content added up-to-date?

Content does not exist


 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?

The content missing is all of the content

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral?

There is no content added


 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?

There are no claims at all


 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?

There are no viewpoints made at all


 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?

N/A

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?

No content at all


 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?

No sources at all


 * Are the sources current?

N/A


 * Check a few links. Do they work?

N/A

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?

There is no content to read


 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors?

N/A


 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?

N/A

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media

N/A


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?

For New Articles Only
If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.


 * Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject?

N/A


 * How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject?

There are no sources


 * Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles?

N/A


 * Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable?

Article does no link to other articles

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete?

Article is incomplete


 * What are the strengths of the content added?

N/A


 * How can the content added be improved?

N/a

Overall evaluation
I see that you haven't started your article. My suggestion would be to start today and work on it piece by piece until the due date which is in a week. I will be more than happy to review your article if you finish it by the weekend. Make sure to follow the guided questions above when adding content to your article.