User:Helengracedaniel/The Boy (book translated from French)/Dmiksa Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Helengracedaniel, Zoenaylor47, Mbb5c


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Helengracedaniel/The Boy (book translated from French)


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Lead

 * The lead is concise and clear. It sets up the article well. It might fit better at the top of the article without a header, though,

Content

 * All the content is up to date and relevant. Nothing seems like a stretch to add more sources.

Tone and Balance

 * The content is balanced and unbiased.
 * The critical reception section feels, for some reason, a bit unnatural, but that could just be me.

Sources and References

 * All content is backed up by a credible and current source.

Organization

 * The content is very well written.
 * There are a few misplaced or missing commas, especially in the intro section.
 * The content is sectioned well into clear and concise groups that flow chronologically.

Images and Media

 * The added picture may add a bit to the article, but I don't think it is necessary, and to be honest, it feels a bit awkward and out of place.

For New Articles Only

 * The article is supported by new, credible sources that cover all the topic areas well.

Overall impressions

 * This article feels complete and is very strong.
 * The content can be improved with some revisions of grammatical errors, re-wording of the critical reception section, and moving the intro to the very top of the article.