User:Helicopter331/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
The Truman Show

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this article because I have seen the movie before, so I thought that I was best prepared to evaluate this article. From a preliminary inspection, the article is very factual and informative, following good Wikipedia standards for an article.

Evaluate the article
Everything in the article is relevant to the topic, there are no unrelated facts in the articles. I couldn't find anything that was out of date, most of the dates were correct. In terms of equity gaps, it should be noted that most of the cast is white, so minorities are underrepresented. The article is very neutral, there are no claims that seem to be biased towards a certain position, nor are there over or underrepresented viewpoints. The links do work in the article and they support the source claims in the article. Each fact is referenced appropriately from neutral sources and a wide array of publishers and publications. On the talk page, there are discussions about revising the summary section of the article from many years ago, claiming that more specific events should be listed that arouse Truman's suspicion to the world around him. The article is listed as a Media and drama good article. Wikipedia discusses the topic by evaluating the article with its standards, discussing whether some content is objective, relevant or factual. In class, we talked about discussing on the talk page about a potential change before actually implementing it, however many of the conversations on the talk page are also evaluating the current material on the page. One question I have is whether the movie is supporting the idea that we might live in a simulation --~ Helicopter331.