User:Helicopter331/Mozart Allegro in D Major/BigAndLarge Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Helicopter331, Awy2006


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Helicopter331/Mozart Allegro in D Major


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead


 * The lead is concise, presents the information related to the article clearly and without confusion

Content


 * The content of the article is relevant and fleshed out
 * Within the confines of what is know about the topic, the content presents a clear and concise explanation
 * Nothing is missing and it is up to date

Tone and Balance


 * The tone and balance is neutral and without any sort of bias

Sources and References


 * The sources are all relevant to the topic at hand
 * All the sources work and lead to their respective pages
 * All the content is backed up by a reliable source

Organization


 * The topic is well written and easy to read
 * There is a good contrast between the simpler explanation of the piece's background and history as well as the descriptive section relating to the piece's musical elements

Notability


 * Considering the article codifies a piece of music from one of the most well known artists of the modern era, Mozart, Id say that this article reaches the notability requirement
 * There are more than two sources that accurately represent and describe the topic at hand

Overall Impressions


 * The article is very direct and features everything an article would need about such topic
 * The musical structure section is particularly well done with in depth explanation
 * If I were to give any suggestions, I would say to flesh out the lead with maybe one more sentence as well as the background, but other than that the article is spotless