User:Hellenlopez/Nancy pilli hernandez/Hellenlopez Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?
 * Akdjap, Anna Kareen
 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Akdjap/Nancy Pili Hernandez


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * User:Akdjap/Nancy Pili Hernandez

Evaluate the drafted changes[edit]
Lead

- is engaging

- concise

- doesn't really introduce the artist though you do later on in the bio

- it does a great job of introducing some type of notability

Content

- seems to be up to date

- includes a lot of important info on artist though you could even break up your bio section into smaller sections if you'd like

- nothing content wise seems to be missing that add anymore depth than what you have provided

Tone and Balance

- neutral tone and not bias

- try to maybe refer to her by last name rather than first so it won't sound to personal

Source and References

- make sure every sentence includes a reference if its not your own words

- most sources do seem reliable

Organization

- could use better heading format though content is separated

- could include like a list of her exhibits or art work by using a subheading heading within the art heading if that makes sense

Images and Media

- could include an image of hers, I just don't know how to do it

- good use of including her social media

- could even provide some type or reference or link on the further readings part

Overall

- there's a lot of content that makes artist worthy of a wiki article

- just fix the headings or divide work more by the way you format