User:Hello Kitty Kermit/sandbox

Evaluating content

 * Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?
 * Everything seems to be related to the topic and nothing really distracted me.
 * Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added?
 * It doesn't seem too out of date but the citations used were all years back and maybe more recent citations and information could be added.
 * Can you identify any notable equity gaps? Does the article underrepresent or misrepresent historically marginalized populations?
 * The article is pretty neutral on all topics but some sections are just a bit longer than others.
 * What else could be improved?
 * It could use more information to make some sections a bit more detailed.

Evaluating tone

 * Is the article neutral? Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * The tone is overall neutral and there doesn't seem to be any claims that seem heavily biased.
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * I don't think anything is really over or underrepresented.

Evaluating sources

 * Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?
 * The links work and support the claims in the article.
 * Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?
 * Facts seem to be referenced from places such as articles and journals that seem neutral and not biased.
 * Do the sources come from a diverse array of authors and publications?
 * The sources come from a diverse array of publications and authors.

Checking the talk page

 * What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?
 * There is conversation about why certain information was removed or moved from the article.
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?
 * The article is rated C-class for quality and High for importance. It is part of the Computing, Internet, and Mass Surveillance projects.
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?
 * Wikipedia tends to go more in depth that what we have discussed in class so far.

Evaluating content

 * Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?
 * For the most part everything seems relevant and nothing really distracted me.
 * Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added?
 * The information all seems to be pretty up to date and the sources are pretty recent.
 * Can you identify any notable equity gaps? Does the article underrepresent or misrepresent historically marginalized populations?
 * There doesn't seem to be any notable equity gaps and is pretty neutral overall. However 2/3 of the sources come from a site related to India.
 * What else could be improved?
 * The article is way too short and could use a lot more information and sources.

Evaluating tone

 * Is the article neutral? Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * The tone overall is neutral and not biased.
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * I think it is also pretty neutral in this aspect but that could also be because there isn't much written.

Evaluating sources

 * Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?
 * The links work and support the claim it is linked to.
 * Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?
 * I feel like the sources are biased towards certain countries since there is not a wide variety but do not seem that biased. Only a small bit of the article is referenced to sources.
 * Do the sources come from a diverse array of authors and publications?
 * It is not really diverse since there is only three.

Checking the talk page

 * What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?
 * There is not any conversation going on.
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?
 * It is rated start-class and low importance for Computing/Software/Security and Espionage and high importance for Mass surveillance projects.
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?
 * There is a lot less discussion here than anything we really discussed in class.