User:HemePathAmanda/sandbox

Nicholas Lao - Nicklao2

Simran Sharma - Simshrm

Thomas Stambulic - Tstambulic

Amanda Mills - millsa7052

Angela Salomon - asalomon2023

Jenn Campbell - jcamp2023

1)     The planned 1-2 sentences are clear, written in simple language, free of jargon and understandable to a 12-year-old (grade 8). Technical and medical terms are wiki-linked if they have not yet appeared in the article. “People-first” language is used and the word “patient” is avoided (i.e. “People with diabetes” rather than “diabetics”). 2 mark

2)     Each of the new sentences proposed for the article has been justified by the student. This justification includes why the change is necessary, where the information came from and why the content they are adding or replacing is inadequate.  3 marks

3)     The student has shown areas of ambiguity or controversy for the proposed change and the position taken has been clearly justified. 2 marks

(note if there is no possible controversy or ambiguity, skip this section and add 1 mark to questions 2 and 4 for a total grade of 10)

4)     The student has identified any validity issues or potential bias within the secondary source they have chosen to support their proposed change. The student’s written content demonstrates an understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of the evidence they have identified. The student can speculate on potential bias of their source and whether (and how) that might have affected their extracted information. 3 marks

Grade:            /10