User:Henny2shoes/Consumerism/Jakemeisen81 Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? (provide username)
 * Henny2shoes
 * Link to draft you're reviewing:
 * User:Henny2shoes/Consumerism

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer?
 * yes it has, very well.
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
 * I think that it could focus more on black consumerism in the first sentence.
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
 * yes it does. The main topic is consumerism which is what it talks about.
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
 * yes, the article does not discuss black consumption.
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?
 * I think it is very well done, and should not be condensed more.

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic?
 * I think it is very relevant, especially where our country is at right now.
 * Is the content added up-to-date?
 * Yes it is.
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?
 * I think the first sentence should just be revised to focus on what the whole addition will be talking about.
 * Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics?
 * it 100% does.

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral?
 * Yes, it provides good non bias content
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * not exactly. it is kind of hard to say because it is all about history so you can't really be that biased.
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * not that I could see.
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?
 * No it just proposes the reader with the history of black people in the consumer realm.

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
 * Yes the sources are very well represented throughout the addition.
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * yes, they are good exterior sources, and sources we used through the course.
 * Are the sources current?
 * yes.
 * Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible?
 * yes there are multiple different sources from different types of people.
 * Check a few links. Do they work?
 * yup, they are active.

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
 * yes, it was very well written.
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors?
 * there are some minor grammatical errors like missing commas, but a couple of proof reads will fix that.
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?
 * yes.

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
 * yes.
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * no.
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * not yet.
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?
 * yes.

For New Articles Only
If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.


 * Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject?
 * yes.
 * How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject?
 * yes it does.
 * Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles?
 * no, the inboxes are so good in this article it is unbelievable.
 * Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable?
 * no.

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete?
 * yes, I very much think that the information provided is not only quality but necessary for this article.
 * What are the strengths of the content added?
 * the reliable sources used were the strengths behind this content.
 * How can the content added be improved?
 * revise the first sentence, and fix small grammatical errors.

Overall evaluation

 * Does your peer have 5-7 reliable sources?
 * yes.
 * Is at least one of them a source from class reading or the "suggested sources" list?
 * yes
 * Does the topic link in some way to our course material?
 * 100% yes.
 * Does your peer add historical context to their article?
 * yes, it is mostly about history.
 * Based on what you know from course content, what do you think Wikipedia users should know about this topic? In other words, what would you recommend adding and/or considering further?
 * I would maybe add other marginalized groups in the consumer space through history.