User:HenryLewis43/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Diana Chapman Walsh

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this article because it was assigned to me. I think this article so far is well written, but lacks content. For the content it does have, there are a reasonable number of citations. I think this article matters because it details the life of a Wellesley College President, and they are important figures. People, especially Wellesley College students, should have access to information about their lives and contributions to the college.

Evaluate the article
The lead sentence tells the reader who Diana Chapman Walsh is. The paragraph details her contributions to the college, and is concise. It does not give an overview of the detailed sections. The content is relevant and up to date. The article is very neutral. The sources are relevant and current. Half of the citations are links to biographies about her on the website of the place she works. The article is well written and organized. The article has no images or media. The article is part of 3 WikiProjects, and is rated C - Low Importance, on all of them. The projects are: The projects are: WikiProject Biography/Science and Academia, United States/Massachusetts and Women writers. The article is a good article, but I think there might be more information available on Walsh that could be included in the article. It is underdeveloped. It is a good article, there just needs to be more of it.