User:Heping Zhang/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Gnomeo & Juliet

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this aticle because I am interested in movie compositions and I was attracted by the movie and book named "Romeo and Julie" so this article is a derivative of it that I'd like to know more.

Evaluate the article
This article has an effective lead section. The leading sentence gives a brief introduction of the movie which includes the type and style, I also have an understanding of the general plot, cast information, and box office of the film, which is more helpful in evaluating whether the film is suitable for me to watch. These summarize the following content completely which is the appropriate navigation for the audience. Also, information in the content is totally relevant to the topic, and it has the capacity to face all the audience without distinction, the data information is accurate and definitive. It talks about facts according to the movie and there is no subjective argument that directs the audience to any viewpoint, the language is neutral. The important content and the minor content are well balanced. The plot part of the movie is written a lot, which can meet people's demand for understanding the movie. From the perspective of investigation, the author also provides box office information and music information related to movies for people to look up. The author also collected multiple comments on the film, including the comprehensive scores of the audience, well-known journals, and film evaluation websites, so as to achieve a diversity of information sources and reduce the occurrence of bias. The source of information is old, but reliable since the theater chain only releases movies for a limited duration and most information is stable such as the soundtrack album. However, as time pass by, part of the content would have some variations such as response to the movie. Therefore, the article could be more comprehensive if insert some up-to-date sources. The structure of the article is clear and organized, and the content is easy to understand. In the given image I can see that it is relevant to the subject, but there is very little material in visual form. On the Talk page, I see it belongs to several WikiProjects.

I think the article is generally valuable, but the synthesis of the information could be improved rather than summarising all sources from five to ten years ago. In addition, I will add pictures or other visual materials in some parts to improve the readability of the article and the efficiency of information dissemination.