User:Herasmr123/Death of Lucy Meadows/Jwerry98 Peer Review

General info
Herasmr123
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:Death of Lucy Meadows - Wikipedia
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Death of Lucy Meadows - Wikipedia

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead includes a passable description. Content is extremely lacking. There is never an explanation on why this is important in anyway. provide more context on significant. Organization would be good if there was more detail in the induvial sections. Sources are good but need to use the sources to add more content. Provide some images so the readers can have a visual something to help understand the article better. Overall this article needs a ton of work done before it is close to complete. Needs detail to explain why the event is even worth having in article. Because as it exists now it is pointless.