User:Heribertomora/sandbox

== Evaluating Articles  Chicano Park

Everything in the article is relevant to the topic it illustrate the start and continuation of the park. I only thing that was distracting would be that some one the top heading would need to be rearranged.
 * 1) Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?

Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? the article is neutral there are no allegation that appear to have any prejudice towards the article. Are there viewpoints that are over represented, or underrepresented? there are some viewpoints that are over represented where some main topic that can be linked or added to other other main topic but no none are underrepresented. Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article? yes, check five links and all of the links do claim what the source mentions in the article are easy accessible.

Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted? all five links that i look at are all newspaper articles, television links and city weekly newspaper articles Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added? everything is updates to my knowledge it was lasted edited on March 1, 2018 but,there is a source missing in the article in the last sentence under the column take over. Check out the Talk page of the article. What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic? After reviewing the Talk page some of the conversations were someone had added a comment with out a resource and added bias tag in the article and lastly there was a correction on a sited source. i would like to rearrange some of the main topic around to make it flow consistence moving the mural photos underneath the mural sub-heading.

How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects? according to the Talk tab it is rated at Start which is being develop but, which is positively incomplete and it is lacking adequate source. it is part of the Wiki Project where it scores low on two categorical scale but scores high in National registry and historical

History
The Glenarm Power Plant is an Art Deco style power plant in Pasadena, California.The steamed power plant has powered the city of Pasadena for over 110 years since its historical opening in July 4, 1907 the 200 KW Crocker-Wheeler generator powering light to the streetlights on Glenarm St. at the end of Raymond Ave. Increasing and outgrowing its facility through time which included 17 power generators unit a 14-acre site. In the 1900's Pasadena was lead the way in municipal lighting conflict with Edison Electric Company (later Southern California Edison) gaining national attention. Mayor of Pasadena William Waterhouse upset with Edison service and high price for electricity refuse to pay soon after decided to pass a bond. Pasadena Water and Power PWP's history begins when The Municipal Light and Power Department was set up in 1906. Pasadena natives passed a $125,000 attach to build a power plant that would jolt road lights for not as much as what Edison charged at the time. Before long, another security measure subsidized greater limit at the power plant, and the office started its first business electric administration in 1908.

In 1912 cycles of dry spell and a populace blast produce the city to build up a bound together, dependable water framework. Following a long time of political battle, subjects passed a $1.2 million bond to buy three private water organizations, and the Pasadena Water Department was established.

Throughout the following two decades, the office updated framework, modernized water treatment offices and secured new and long haul water supplies. Pasadena additionally went up against a position of authority in provincial water matters, both in the development of the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California in 1929 and in the 1944 settling of directing rights for the Raymond Basin.



Current Status
On June 2, 2014, the Pasadena City Council endorsed the development contract to add GT-5, with commercial activity slated to start in June 2016.The unit would be a profoundly proficient, 71-MW GE LM6000 consolidated cycle. The new unit, GT-5, was proposed to replace the outdated Unit B-3 situated on the Broadway site. B-3 was touted as the U.S's. most-proficient unit when it entered benefit in 1965, however GT-5 would be almost twice as effective as the old steam heater gear. A formal ground breaking event on July 2, 2014 where work was to begin rapidly. The new gas turbine, GT-5, was introduced as a part of a $132 million re-powering project at Glenarm. After, lawsuits, substantial rain and a bigger than-anticipated design delay on May 2016 it was completed. The turbine gives a steady wellspring of reinforcement control that allows Pasadena Water and Power to incorporate more renewable but intermittent energy, for example, solar and wind also offers a quick-start capability that can generate power within minutes instead of the 72-hour start up time required for the old framework. he site contains a four simple-cycle gas turbine generating units, GT-1 through GT-4, and one combined cycle generating unit, GT-5. The plant is bisected by the Metro Gold Line rails and is bordered on the east by the northern terminus of the Pasadena Freeway and Blair International Baccalaureate School

Filming
The site has a been a popular filming location for decades.

Music Videos Appearances:

Janet Jackson Rhythm Nation (music video)

Quiet Riot The Wild And The Young

Michael Jackson Moonwalker

Movie Appearances:

2015 Freaks of Nature

2011 In Time

Nightmare on Elm Street Franchise

On October 16, 2012, the Pratt and Whitney turbine in GT-2 failed, apparently due to breakage of a blade in the power turbine, causing a fire but no injuries. Units GT-1, GT-3, and B-3 were already offline for repairs, leaving the station with only the 45 MW GT-4 unit. The B-3 steam unit was brought back online a few days later.