User:HexaRose/Choose an Article

Article Selection
Please list articles that you're considering for your Wikipedia assignment below. Begin to critique these articles and find relevant sources.

Option 1

 * Article title:CMP kinase
 * Article Evaluation
 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic?
 * Yes it is relevant.
 * Is it written neutrally?
 * Yes.
 * Does each claim have a citation?
 * Yes.
 * Are the citations reliable?
 * Yes
 * Does the article tackle one of Wikipedia's equity gaps (coverage of historically underrepresented or misrepresented populations or subjects)?
 * No


 * Sources:

Option 2

 * Article title:Artemin
 * Article Evaluation
 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic?
 * Yes it is relevant.
 * Is it written neutrally?
 * Yes.
 * Does each claim have a citation?
 * No.
 * Are the citations reliable?
 * Yes
 * Does the article tackle one of Wikipedia's equity gaps (coverage of historically underrepresented or misrepresented populations or subjects)?
 * No


 * Sources:

Option 3

 * Article title:ERMAP
 * Article Evaluation
 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic?
 * Yes it is relevant.
 * Is it written neutrally?
 * Yes.
 * Does each claim have a citation?
 * No.
 * Are the citations reliable?
 * Yes
 * Does the article tackle one of Wikipedia's equity gaps (coverage of historically underrepresented or misrepresented populations or subjects)?
 * No


 * Sources:

Option 4

 * Article title:CD5L
 * Article Evaluation
 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic?
 * Yes it is relevant.
 * Is it written neutrally?
 * Yes.
 * Does each claim have a citation?
 * No.
 * Are the citations reliable?
 * Yes
 * Does the article tackle one of Wikipedia's equity gaps (coverage of historically underrepresented or misrepresented populations or subjects)?
 * No


 * Sources:

Option 5

 * Article title:EPHA10
 * Article Evaluation
 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic?
 * Yes it is relevant.
 * Is it written neutrally?
 * Yes.
 * Does each claim have a citation?
 * No.
 * Are the citations reliable?
 * Yes
 * Does the article tackle one of Wikipedia's equity gaps (coverage of historically underrepresented or misrepresented populations or subjects)?
 * No


 * Sources: