User:Hey0987654321/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Cognitive behavioral training - Wikipedia

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

I chose this article because it relates to my psychology class as it talks about cognitive behavioral training.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

The article is well written and everything in the article is relevant to the topic. The lead includes a good starting sentence that clearly states what the article is about.

There were a few references from 2001 and 2003 that may be out of date. The article is neutral as it gives facts about cognitive behavioral training and tells how it is different from cognitive behavioral therapy.

I think there could have been more said about the development of CBTraining.

The sources come from a diverse array of articles and they support the claims in the article.

This article is rated as mid-importance and c-class. On the talk page people talked about making the article easier to read and making some of the references up to date.