User:Hez28/Lake Lucerne/Rosemary Guo Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Hez28


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Hez28/Lake Lucerne


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Lake Lucerne

Evaluate the drafted changes

 * It has a very good structure of your article, which begin with the general information of Lake Lucerne, such as its nickname and area. However, it seems weight too much on that infomation in your articel, and I'm not sure if that all can be considered as 'lake ecology'. Most of them seem to like geography. Thus, you may need to refine your statement in your first several paragraphs and focuse more on limnology in the following paragraphs. In brief, it's a really good introduction part.
 * For some of the academic words or terms, such as 'monomictic lake', 'oligotrophic' and 'macro-geological structure', you could consider to add hyperlinks or explanations to tlak more about that to make sure people who know a little about lake also can understand your article.
 * 'The Light Intensity of Lake Lucerne is better, and the Euphotic zone will be deeper.' Maybe you can add more explanation for this statement.
 * it's very interesting to talk about the origin of Lake Lucerne, but I may want to know more about the ecology things about the lake, like the food web, or impact of nutrients for species, or species diversity. You may talk more about that in your following writing.
 * After finishing all body paragraph, you may divide them into different topic, in other words, making the leads, to help people keep track your article easily.
 * The picture you posted seems non-free, you may consider to remove that or find a replacement.

I think it's a really good start. Please keep writing!