User:Hgabrie/Dorothee Kern/Gamoch Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Hgabrie


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Hgabrie/Dorothee Kern
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Dorothee Kern

Evaluate the drafted changes
- everything in the article is relavant to the article topic; I did not find anything distracting (if anything, I was able to stay focused due to the subsections that broke up a potentially large and overwhelming section)

- the article is neutral; I did not notice any bias or favoring certain viewpoints

- the links do work for the various citations

- all of the information in the article is referenced, and the references all appear to be reliable and appropriate

- I did not notice anything that was missing or needed to be added. The information seemed well-rounded and every aspect from family to publications was provided