User:Hgraha5/Koala/Cal2air Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Hgraha5


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Koala (link not available somehow)


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes

 * 1) First, what does the article do well? Is there anything from your review that impressed you? Any turn of phrase that described the subject in a clear way?

N/A as article isn’t present. Will contact author.


 * 1) What changes would you suggest the author apply to the article? Why would those changes be an improvement?

N/A as article isn’t present at this current time. Will contact author.


 * 1) What's the most important thing the author could do to improve the article?

N/A as article isn’t present at this current time.


 * 1) Did you notice anything about the article you reviewed that could be applicable to your own article? If so, what?

N/A as article isn’t present at this current time. Will contact author.


 * 1) Are the sections organized well, in a sensible order? Would they make more sense presented some other way (chronologically, for example)? Specifically, does the information they are adding to the article make sense where they are putting it?

N/A as article isn’t present at this current time. Will contact author.


 * 1) Is each section's length equal to its importance to the article's subject? Are there sections in the article that seem unnecessary? Is anything off-topic?

N/A as article isn’t present at this current time. Will contact author.


 * 1) Does the article draw conclusions or try to convince the reader to accept one particular point of view?

N/A as article isn’t present at this current time. Will contact author.


 * 1) Are there any words or phrases that don't feel neutral? For example, "the best idea," "most people," or negative associations, such as "While it's obvious that x, some insist that y."

N/A as article isn’t present at this current time. Will contact author.


 * 1) Are most statements in the article connected to a reliable source, such as textbooks and journal articles? Or do they rely on blogs or self-published authors?

N/A as article isn’t present at this current time. Will contact author.


 * 1) Are there a lot of statements attributed to one or two sources? If so, it may lead to an unbalanced article, or one that leans too heavily into a single point of view.

N/A as article isn’t present at this current time. Will contact author.


 * 1) Are there any unsourced statements in the article, or statements that you can't find stated in the references? Just because there is a source listed, doesn't mean it's presented accurately!

N/A as article isn’t present at this current time. Will contact author.