User:Hikabot/sandbox/article evaluation

Evaluating Content
The article on Animal Crossing is pretty relevant in terms of discussing the video game series as a whole. However, there is a section purely on female demographics that seems pretty irrelevant. Nothing seems outdated or missing from the article.

Evaluating Tone
As previously stated, the section talking about female demographics seems kind of out of place and possibly unnecessary, and it's a viewpoint that doesn't seem to have its counter appear in terms of male demographics.

Evaluating Sources
The sources seem to all work and support claims in the article, and they are mostly neutral sources because they are video game websites that just discuss the release of the game. Not all facts are backed by sources though, such as how the gameplay of the game works.

Checking the talk page
The conversations that people have talk about different sources to use for particular gameplay points and how it should be an independent page, not the game based on the GameCube which has the same name. It's part of the WikiProjects for Video Games and is a C-graded page. The way they discuss this topic is much more lenient and casual versus how we've talked about in class which feels like it should be more formal.