User:Hipal/Doubtful sources

List of websites that are of questionable reliability.

I plan to organize the list by reliability in some manner.

Yes, I realize that simply having a disclaimer of accuracy is not sufficient to determine the reliability of a source.

Places to look for discussions: WP:RSP, WP:RSN, other noticeboards, review discussions.


 * List of fake news websites

Numbered

 * removed - wiki that expanded from a motorcycle website - died in 2014 and became spam site
 * extremely unlikely - appears to be a very low-quality scraping site
 * unclear - blog? - possible scraping and copyvio
 * questionable - needs discussion - redirects to marketscreener.com

A

 * blog
 * might be used if author is noted expert - generally no for BLP
 * user submitted - WP:ABOUTSELF or ELOFFICIAL, but likely lots of linkspam
 * blog
 * pr service from breakdownservices.com
 * questionable - not much discussion - often cites it's own sources
 * blog
 * very unlikely - cannot find statements for terms or accuracy
 * doubtful per https://talentinfusion.io/ https://blavityinc.com/terms-conditions/
 * user submitted
 * same as allmusic - questionable for disputed BLP
 * linkspam - RSP entry - questionable for disputed BLP info
 * user submitted
 * no consensus at RSN
 * extremely doubtful
 * questionable per RSN - CIRCULAR? - SPAM?
 * dubious - looks like a blog
 * doubtful - needs discussion
 * questionable, but difficult to tell - aggregator? - relationship with Medium.com? - are most/all authors freelancers?
 * unreliable per RSN - user-submitted material
 * user-submitted material
 * doubtful - broad disclaimer
 * user edited content - likely scrapped content
 * user created content - publisher takes no responsibility
 * unreliable per RSN
 * Astrology blog - spamming - needs cleanup
 * Public relations
 * blog - publicity
 * RSN
 * probably not reliable for BLP info
 * RSN
 * probably not reliable for BLP info

B

 * - blacklisted
 * pr service
 * publicity for videos - seems questionable for
 * User submitted
 * questionable - some discussion - poor translations, grandiose language, and blatant biases
 * entertainment publicity and advertising
 * Reliable - needs cleanup
 * user-submitted content
 * heavily promotional - venue for publicity
 * SOAP and non-independent primary if used as a source. Could be an official website in certain conditions. ~200. No discussions
 * SOAP and non-independent primary if used as a source. Could be an official website in certain conditions. ~200. No discussions


 * looks poor per RSN - could use more discussion - spam?
 * indicates checked information with a green checkmark - biographical info may have come from the individual
 * questionable, linkspam
 * redirects - copyvio site? - User_talk:Titodutta/Archive_83 - cleaned Sept'18
 * No noticeboard discussions. Entertainment site. Republishes press releases. ~50 links.
 * Talk:Joy_(Fefe_Dobson_album) follow up needed
 * Talk:Joy_(Fefe_Dobson_album) follow up needed


 * blog
 * store - spam?
 * spammed - might be useful placeholder reference when article is in extremely poor shape - bhutan2008.blogspot.com, ugyendorji.blogspot.com, 202.89.26.125, 202.89.26.209, 202.89.26.221, 218.186.9.5
 * user submitted and edited- odssf.com was copied from it
 * from A&E (still?) - likely reliable - needs cleanup
 * blog
 * blog
 * typical celeb bio group blog trying to appear like something more
 * submitted content
 * doubtful given their prominent disclaimer
 * REFSPAM? look closer
 * blog - aspires to be something more but looks like all the others
 * blog without any identifying information - links to celebsdetails.com
 * blog
 * may be ok as a source on a case-by-case basis as it references unreliable sources - there is spam
 * blog - didn't look for discussion
 * blog
 * - no - another celeb measurements site - disclaimer
 * blog
 * questionable - was XLinkBot reverting it? - one brief discussion - spam - editors have done cleanup
 * doubtful
 * - user submissions
 * promo
 * doubtful - promotions
 * No. Valnet Inc. See therichest.com - also cbr.com, screenrant.com, thetalko.com, others
 * looks like a blog - takes submissions
 * blog
 * submitted content
 * looks like a pr service using multiple domains for specific services
 * Lego fan site
 * blog
 * looks like a personal blog
 * unclear WikiProject Television/Reliable sources - linkspam
 * doubtful, promo - discussion would be helpful
 * looks like a pr service using multiple domains for specific services
 * Lego fan site
 * blog
 * looks like a personal blog
 * unclear WikiProject Television/Reliable sources - linkspam
 * doubtful, promo - discussion would be helpful

C

 * extremely doubtful
 * highly promotional - probably not reliable for BLP
 * doubtful - some spamming - promotional - uses poor references
 * changed to mandy.com above
 * spammy, no termsReliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_36
 * probably should use their refs instead, if they meet our criteria
 * doubtful
 * disclaimer
 * Extremely doubtful
 * No - RSN
 * group blog http://gofugyourself.com http://dlisted.com justjared.com (blacklisted) http://pajiba.com
 * another celeb stat blog
 * redirects to celebritypictures.wiki
 * obvious
 * blog?
 * group blog - often identifies their sources - disclaimer but strives for accuracy - warmed over press releases
 * unreliable - personality profiles related to promotions for a numerologist
 * Not reliable
 * Bluetahoe99, not reliable according to RSN
 * blog
 * blog - disclaimer
 * individual's blog "wiki"
 * blog - relationship with catchthemes.com
 * blog - nothing beyond a copyright - links from birthdaycelebs.com - selectdmedia.com celebsmoney.com similar-games.com tonights.tv dvdsreleases.com birthdayanswers.com celebscouples.com
 * blog
 * they don't offer even basic info about themselves and their services - looks like scraping site
 * blog - celebritywoods.com - spam
 * looks like a blog - publicity
 * no info about site at all beyond generic privacy policy
 * nothing but "© CELEBSTRENDNOW.COM || All right reserved"
 * blog
 * celeb blog
 * blog
 * scraper? CIRCULAR?
 * clickbait
 * doubtful - needs discussion - currently hosts Showbiz Cheat Sheet - used to host Wall St Cheatsheet(?)
 * RSP entry for dailycaller
 * another celeb group blog - needs cleanup
 * dubious - review needed
 * doubtful - blog
 * doubtful - defunct - user-submitted content - scraping
 * linkspam, possible spam - doubtful - one person accumulating info without attribution
 * blog
 * disclaimer to individual authors
 * promotions, press releases
 * doubtful - churnalism and publicity
 * blog
 * unclear - looks like publicity and clickbait
 * user submitted, copyvio
 * - spamming - questionable if at all reliable
 * user-submitted info
 * difficult to tell - republisher? group blog?
 * looks like a group blog
 * disclaimer, aggregator
 * extremely doubtful - not even basic info
 * - extremely doubtful - ~170 uses, so needs review at least
 * - spamming - questionable if at all reliable
 * user-submitted info
 * difficult to tell - republisher? group blog?
 * looks like a group blog
 * disclaimer, aggregator
 * extremely doubtful - not even basic info
 * - extremely doubtful - ~170 uses, so needs review at least

D

 * video blog
 * blog-like, scraper
 * blog - spam?
 * looks more like a blog
 * extremely unlikely - group blog
 * gaming news - more like a blog than anything - extremely doubtful for blp - RSN is against but discussion have been brief
 * not reliable per RSN - useful external link at times - user submissions - disclaimer - linkspam
 * submitted content
 * doubtful - Matters Media, Inc - promotion and management
 * questionable, unprofessional, poor English
 * blog - spamming by ?
 * blog - circular
 * blog-like, publicity
 * not for anything controversial - questionable - some sort of submitted entries or the like from non-staff that are not clearly identified as such - family of brands includes: About.com, The Balance, Lifewire, The Spruce, ThoughtCo, TripSavvy, Verywell, verywellfamily.com, verywellhealth.com, and verywellmind.com; thebalancecareers
 * looks like a blog - likely copyvio
 * extremely doubtful - promotional blog
 * blog-like
 * extremely doubtful - promotional blog
 * blog-like

E

 * prominent "Disclaimer" link - disclaimers in top articles
 * Looks like just another extremely poor bio site
 * blog
 * Non-English database. ~280
 * looks like a blog
 * uses Wikipedia
 * blog - submitted articles
 * looks like a blog
 * primary at best
 * looks like a blog
 * primary at best

F

 * strange disclaimer, REFSPAM?, User_talk:GRuban
 * not reliable - aggregates
 * linkspam - lengthy discussions - consensus appears to be that its primary source at best, but should review discussions more carefully
 * generic stats site - No meta-info beyond generic privacy statement
 * blog
 * blog
 * appears to be a blog
 * extremely doubtful - user-edited content - disclaimer - same publishing network as whosdatedwho.com
 * blog
 * another celeb stats domain
 * not reliable according to RSN
 * unlikely, spammy, blog, famouslyarrested
 * blog, famously-dead
 * blog
 * questionable - further discussion would help
 * blog
 * blog
 * blog
 * wiki
 * address database - extremely doubtful
 * fan database - doubtful
 * social media
 * doubtful - tabloid
 * blog?
 * blog
 * - not seeing discussion - appears to use third-party content without review
 * user submitted, likely copyvio
 * redirects - user submitted
 * Polish language - user submitted?
 * needs cleanup - not reliable - WikiProject_Film/Resources
 * possible spamming - 69.118.102.150
 * blog
 * user-submitted - a bit difficult to categorize what this is: hosting, blogging, entertainment media, +
 * extremely doubtful
 * RSN - blog
 * no information about it at all - facade of some sort - public relations?
 * not reliable at RSN
 * takes submitted content if not overly promotional
 * RSN - blog
 * no information about it at all - facade of some sort - public relations?
 * not reliable at RSN
 * takes submitted content if not overly promotional
 * takes submitted content if not overly promotional

G

 * doubtful - press releases
 * per RSN discussions, specific to this and about this category of websites
 * RSN
 * looks like open wiki
 * collaborative - not reliable according to brief mention at RSN
 * generally no, especially for BLP content. User-submitted content.
 * blog, circular, scrapes?
 * submitted content
 * disclaimer
 * blog
 * extremely doubtful
 * group blog?
 * Linkspam and promotion - probably reliable if used with care to avoid SOAP and BLP problems
 * dubious, disclaimer, vanity
 * Needs discussion http://www.go-star.com/antiquing
 * blog, spammed, coi
 * collaborative, wiki-like
 * submitted content, RSN discussion
 * submitted - cannot find legal statements
 * not sure what to make of this - they're working hard to get publicity
 * at least some user submitted - needs a more careful look
 * doubtful
 * primary, promotional - Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Spam/2020_Archive_Apr_6
 * not sure what to make of this - discuss?
 * promotional blog, submitted content
 * primary, promotional - Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Spam/2020_Archive_Apr_6
 * not sure what to make of this - discuss?
 * promotional blog, submitted content

H

 * disclaimer
 * image scraping
 * blog - some entries are attributed to the subject
 * fairly poor source for BLP info
 * blog
 * typical stats blog
 * unlikely - no info about itself - has a list of artists without songs
 * blog
 * group blog?
 * cites Wikipedia
 * blog
 * Looks poor, more like a group blog. Uses unreliable sources
 * generally reliable for non-controversial info Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_34
 * questionable - discussion needed
 * group blog maybe?
 * extremely doubtful - appears to copied from Wikipedia without acknowledgement
 * questionable - strong marketing focus
 * blog
 * per RSN
 * site not working well enough to tell if this is anything but a blog
 * blog
 * user generated
 * site not working well enough to tell if this is anything but a blog
 * blog
 * user generated

I

 * defunct - dubious
 * needs cleanup - might be worth new RSN discussion but may be reliable for non-contentious info
 * no meta info at all
 * blog
 * blog
 * entertainment site - spammed - Wikipedia_talk:Noticeboard_for_India-related_topics/Archive_42
 * blog
 * public relations, coaching
 * blog/wiki/scraper - no info about itself
 * disclaimer
 * submitted content blog?
 * copyvio site
 * doubtful - unclear - promo for their services
 * probably unreliable - need to look for discussions
 * CIRCULAR
 * blog
 * blog

J

 * user submitted - 2008 RSN
 * open wiki
 * varies in quality - use with care - needs linkspam cleanup
 * No "Most of the time we don't even do research."
 * - RSN - needs a close examination - technology and budget are surprisingly poor - http://www.jockbio.com/HTML/whoweare.html Mark L. Stewart
 * nothing about itself
 * submitted content
 * many links, little discussion
 * extremely doubtful
 * doubtful

K

 * doubtful "We have absolutely no plans of having our own news team. " "Send us any content that you think the surfers will find it useful. We are currently interested in working with freelancers who can send us content and/or photos."
 * blog
 * unreliable - Content from Wikipedia
 * unreliable per RSP
 * blog
 * group blog/portal
 * - translation service

L

 * unreliable, user submitted according to RSN
 * pr agency
 * treat as self-published, primary - there is spam
 * dubious - needs discussion
 * blog
 * blog?
 * social media - user submitted
 * doubtful - needs discussion
 * disclaimer
 * dubious because of marketing approach
 * rare cases as a primary source - social media website
 * questionable, clickbait - could use some discussion
 * doubtful - blog - claims to be used by reliable news media, so follow up would help
 * blog with forums
 * unreliable - needs cleanup - old wiki, redirects to famousfix.com
 * blacklisted - spamming - questionable if at all reliable
 * blacklisted - spamming - questionable if at all reliable

M

 * looks poor and promotional
 * unlikely - doubtful for BLP - needs discussion
 * seems poor - needs discussion - scraping and lifting without attribution - evolvemediallc
 * submitted content, disclaimer
 * user submitted? - needs discussion
 * blog
 * blog
 * dubious - announcements, promotions, and user submissions
 * reliable - old AMA website that now redirects - needs cleanup
 * questionable - needs discussion
 * spamming, submitted content
 * blog user:Yujeshkc
 * user:Yujeshkc
 * no per RSN
 * blog
 * RSN - blog
 * dead - extremely questionable if at all reliable
 * user submitted
 * blog, promo site, includes user submitted content (always identified?)
 * unclear
 * RSN - score is fine
 * - publicity site?
 * - blog
 * search engine? working from what?
 * extremely doubtful - user submissions - no basic info - needs cleanup
 * polished blog?
 * disclaimer - looks like it's scraping
 * user-submitted content, in-world and promotional
 * very old, self-published, barely used, no discussion
 * music/artist promotion
 * open wiki that cites Wikipedia - needs cleanup and discussion
 * appears poor - appears to serve as a publicity outlet
 * questionable, but unclear - more discussion needed
 * extremely doubtful - lyrics site - looks like scraping, etc
 * unlikely
 * some content is user submitted - disclaimer
 * - dead - questionable if at all reliable
 * blog
 * entertainment blog and promotions
 * user submitted content - linkspam - disclaimer
 * unlikely
 * blog
 * entertainment blog and promotions
 * user submitted content - linkspam - disclaimer
 * unlikely
 * unlikely

N

 * looks like a blog
 * blog, submissions
 * blog
 * unlikely - disclaimer - user submitted profiles - "Wiki" heading for Celebrities Biographies, Celebrities Articles and Celebrities News
 * blog
 * no id/contact/etc, pages have a "modify" button
 * blog - redirects to .org
 * no per RSN
 * highly questionable - needs discussion - user-submitted content?
 * at least in part a publicity site
 * blog? copyvio? scraper? disclaimer
 * questionable - needs discussion
 * blog
 * blog
 * blog
 * very poor per RSN - entertainment group blog
 * small-time news site or blog - spammed, socking
 * linkspam at least - no reliable per multiple RSN discussions
 * - not reliable - scrapes/mirrors/copies - Advameg site
 * linkspam - unreliable per brief RSN discussion
 * needs cleanup of extra links
 * defunct - attempt at being a movie database
 * extremely doubtful - lacks basic info - scraping with some attribution

O

 * doubtful - looks like a blog - user submitted reviews
 * no evidence of fact checking - may be scraping or accepting copies of others' work without proper attribution
 * unclear - needs discussion - advertises calls for articles - missing basic info - likely group blog
 * no evidence of fact checking - no attribution - likely scraping
 * RSN and RSPAM discussions
 * copyvio site
 * looks like some attempt at accuracy
 * disclaimer - does not provide minimum info
 * may be ok as a source but there is spam
 * probably not - needs discussion - looks like they've pulled past articles and no longer create them

P

 * doubtful - "Ultimate Movie and TV Database"
 * disclaimer, amateur
 * blog
 * spammed travel site needs cleanup
 * disclaimer, mostly user-submitted without clear identification
 * user submitted
 * user submitted
 * looks like content is being copied from other sites
 * unlikely - cannot find statements for terms or accuracy
 * blog
 * tabloid-ish, slightly more than a group blog - more discussion needed
 * disclaimer
 * looks like a blog - very tabloid
 * some articles are contributions from "community"
 * blog
 * blog
 * Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_211
 * Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_211


 * >300. seems at best self-published. no noticeboard discussions. Cannot find discussions where source was kept
 * >300. seems at best self-published. no noticeboard discussions. Cannot find discussions where source was kept
 * >300. seems at best self-published. no noticeboard discussions. Cannot find discussions where source was kept


 * unreliable aggregator per article talk page discussions
 * unlikely - publicity site
 * copyvio site - cleaned up May'17
 * user-submitted marketing
 * doubtful - redirects to urban.com.au
 * Haven't looked - related to virtual-history apparently
 * adding both as external links


 * French. Appears tabloid-quality
 * blog, promo

R

 * uses Wikipedia
 * unreliable - user-submitted
 * spam?
 * tabloid-quality
 * no indication of reliability - no discussions
 * linkspam - publicity - user-submitted
 * questionable - needs discussion
 * blog
 * looks like open database
 * promotional blog
 * blog
 * blog
 * submitted content
 * dubious
 * unclear
 * contributed articles, disclaimer
 * brief mentions at RSN where it's rejected as unreliable
 * unclear
 * contributed articles, disclaimer
 * brief mentions at RSN where it's rejected as unreliable

S

 * questionable - haven't looked for discussion
 * difficult to tell, but looks like copyvio site
 * circular? didn't look closely
 * blog - brief RSN discussion
 * blog
 * blog, spammed,, , User:Teblick/Reliable_Sources
 * disclaimer - FAC rejection?
 * doubtful - spam? - contributors make it questionable
 * SEO blog - at least some spamming - needs cleanup
 * slick blog
 * blog
 * blog
 * public relations service
 * doubtful - scraping? - outdated
 * unstable site - accepts user-submitted content
 * copyvio site
 * blog
 * has a template
 * unlikely - discount movie ticket app - info likely scraped
 * cannot find statements for terms or accuracy
 * looks like a blog
 * disclaimer
 * linkspam - unlikely for BLP info
 * very doubtful - needs cleanup
 * very unlikely - cannot find statements for terms or accuracy
 * unlikely - user-submitted content
 * no per brief discussion - scrapes public records
 * no per multiple RSN discussions - user submitted - interviews may be ok, but are primary sources - needs cleanup
 * promotional
 * RSN - "Generally unreliable"
 * doubtful - looks like a group blog
 * Reliable - needs cleanup
 * needs cleanup for linkspam, disclaimer
 * Dubious. Unable to get pages to render. Archives show a very low-budget site.
 * blog
 * extremely questionable - publicity
 * submitted content, disclaimer
 * publicity blog
 * typical stats blog - user Makash007
 * blog
 * blog - idolnetworth.com networthlist.org
 * blog
 * questionable, promo, refspam?, spammed?
 * scraper
 * unlikely
 * unlikely
 * another celeb bio blog, likely a copy of another
 * blog - circular - might be a source for refs
 * unlikely
 * another celeb bio blog, likely a copy of another
 * blog - circular - might be a source for refs

T

 * disclaimer
 * (TCMDB Turner Classics Movie Database) - unclear - needs further discussion
 * one individual's definitions with no references
 * legal pages are blank - has a disclaimer page
 * blog - publicity
 * blog with user-submitted content
 * linkspam - probably not noteworthy - past cleanup - see Telly Awards AfDs
 * Not reliable per RSN - public relations and user contributions
 * spammed blog as an external link
 * RSN: not for BLP info, fine for movie financials
 * No per RSN
 * blog
 * new celebrity/entertainment news site - cares more about TMZ connections apparently - may be a poor but sometimes acceptable source similar to TMZ, but too soon to tell as of Jan 2018
 * Questionable. Puffery. Clickbait. Needs close examination. WP:ICTFFAQ, Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_353, Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_339, Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_348
 * group blog? REFSPAM?
 * group blog
 * doubtful
 * Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Spam/2015_Archive_May_1
 * Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_207
 * Talk:Maharishi_Mahesh_Yogi/Archive_6
 * Help_desk/Archives/2017_May_29
 * Example of poor quality: http://www.thefamouspeople.com/profiles/trisha-paytas-7802.php
 * Editors are sometimes treating it as reliable despite sensationalism, poor quality, and no evidence of it being reliable.
 * Editors are sometimes treating it as reliable despite sensationalism, poor quality, and no evidence of it being reliable.


 * possible coi, possible spam, no general discussion Talk:Bonnie_Wright#Official_and_unofficial_websites
 * blog
 * looks poor and promotional - GRV Media - need to look closer
 * questionable - needs more discussion
 * questionable - group blog
 * disclaimer, draws from Wikipedia
 * more like a blog than a news source with prominent disclaimer
 * not reliable per RSN
 * redirects to .com
 * blog - unclear if there are subject matter experts here
 * blog
 * unreliable per short discussions
 * typical stats blog - user Makash007
 * questionable - high-profile soliciting for contributors - don't appear to identify contributors vs staff
 * RSN
 * open database
 * blog, focusing on announcements
 * linkspam needs cleanup - RSN discussions indicate it's slightly worse than BoxOfficeMojo for budget, grosses, etc.
 * submitted content - disclaimer
 * clickbait and promotional articles - appears rather poor, especially for BLP
 * unlikely - user submitted content
 * tabloid-ish - see WP:RSP
 * blog, CIRCULAR - needs cleanup
 * promotional - could use more discussion
 * entertainment publicity and advertising
 * no indication of accuracy
 * blog
 * disclaimer
 * poor - less than minimal information - could use some discussion
 * aggregator
 * tabloid - brief, scathing mention at RSN
 * doubtful - blog?
 * needs cleanup - generally unreliable WikiProject Television/Reliable sources
 * doubtful - simplistic video search site
 * wiki, registration required
 * No - blog that solicits "unpaid as well as paid positions" "Experience is not required, but a love for television and writing is." Wikipedia_talk:Manual_of_Style/Television/Archive_5
 * questionable - group blog - no discussion
 * poor - less than minimal information - could use some discussion
 * aggregator
 * tabloid - brief, scathing mention at RSN
 * doubtful - blog?
 * needs cleanup - generally unreliable WikiProject Television/Reliable sources
 * doubtful - simplistic video search site
 * wiki, registration required
 * No - blog that solicits "unpaid as well as paid positions" "Experience is not required, but a love for television and writing is." Wikipedia_talk:Manual_of_Style/Television/Archive_5
 * questionable - group blog - no discussion
 * questionable - group blog - no discussion

U

 * blog
 * blog
 * user-submitted
 * questionable - site is publicity oriented
 * questionable, promotional
 * scraped?

V

 * prominent disclaimer - past spamming
 * unreliable per RSN
 * Can't find discussions - asked 3 editors
 * User_talk:Foobarnix - My suggestion was to take to ELN
 * User_talk:Cst17 - No response
 * User_talk:Softlavender "I really don't know; my impression or guess at the time was that it was some sort of information/image/links aggregator"
 * ~1200 links


 * no indication it is reliable.

W

 * - questionable in best of cases - discussions say author is respected but without documentation - much info on the site is unfinished, some outdated
 * redirects, no archive - no idea what it was - russian models, check w/ user:Szonline1988 ?
 * blog
 * maybe ok? their marketspeak and doublespeak suggests great care should be taken
 * spam? - blog - no discussion - needs cleanup
 * - typical celeb stats blog
 * unlikely - copyvio?
 * doubtful - blog - to provide content for jayde.com? - related to twellow.com
 * unreliable per RSN and WikiProject_Professional_wrestling/Sources
 * looks like a blog
 * old tv program catalog - cannot find helpful info in archives for evidence of reliability
 * user submitted? no indication of attempts at accuracy
 * defunct blog
 * defunct blog - uses Wikipedia as source
 * linkspam - questionable
 * rsn - disclaimer
 * blog
 * {{LinkSummaryLive|wikiborn.com)) another stat blog
 * {{LinkSummaryLive|wikinetworth.com}} wiki
 * {{LinkSummaryLive|wikinetworthbio.com}} another stats blog
 * {{LinkSummaryLive|wikimarried.com}}
 * {{LinkSummaryLive|wikifame.org}}
 * {{LinkSummaryLive|wikihow.com}} wiki - linkspam
 * {{LinkSummaryLive|wikipicky.com}} looks like a blog
 * {{LinkSummaryLive|wikitree.com}} open wiki - not reliable per RSN
 * {{LinkSummaryLive|wikipicky.com}} unlikely
 * {{LinkSummaryLive|wogma.com}} movie review blog
 * {{LinkSummaryLive|womenfitness.net}}
 * {{LinkSummaryLive|woopidoo.com}} blog - rejected in article talk page discussions
 * {{LinkSummaryLive|worlds-greatest-riddles.com}} blob - spam likely
 * {{LinkSummaryLive|worldinsport.com}} group blog?
 * {{LinkSummaryLive|worldsrichpeople.com}} blog - circular
 * {{LinkSummaryLive|worldwrapfederation.com}} submitted content
 * {{LinkSummaryLive|worthpoint.com}} needs discussion
 * {{LinkSummaryLive|worldwrapfederation.com}} submitted content
 * {{LinkSummaryLive|worthpoint.com}} needs discussion

X

 * extremely doubtful

Y

 * questionable
 * user-submitted news ranker
 * disclaimer
 * blog
 * disclaimer (translation)
 * disclaimer

Z

 * unlikely - local gossip and publicity
 * extremely doubtful - group blog? - includes attributions, but uses user-created sites

Unsorted

 * 1) http://mouthshut.com
 * 2) http://www.schoolconnects.in
 * 3) http://www.examweb.in
 * 4) http://recharzon.com
 * 1) http://recharzon.com


 * blabbermouth.net allmusic.com bijog.com


 * 1) http://answrhub.com/saint-rumm-wiki-biography-age-birthday-instagram-star-family-girlfriend-profile/
 * 2) http://www.celebnest.com/dating-history/692358-saint-rumm/
 * 3) http://dreamhome.id/s/saint-rumm-bio-facts-family-famous-birthdays.html
 * 4) http://kabarbolaterbaru.xyz/saint/saint-rumm-bio-facts-family-famous-birthdays.html
 * 5) http://yooying.com/saint_rumm
 * 6) https://socialmediafeed.me/ig/user/saint_rumm#
 * 7) http://www.imgrum.online/u/saint_rumm
 * 1) http://www.imgrum.online/u/saint_rumm


 * Draft:Gary A Wales
 * 1) Box Office Buz
 * 2) CelebMix EXCLUSIVE: Interview with Actor and Social Media Personality Gary Wales
 * 3) Expertoscs
 * 4) Healthy Celeb
 * 5) Frost Snow
 * 6) Snapchat Celebrity
 * 7) Deep Commotion Talent Meets Social Media
 * 8) IABD
 * 9) Celeb VM
 * 10) Locker Dome
 * 11) Milkey Beauty's
 * 12) Born Wiki


 * Draft:Alicia Grimes:
 * - user submissions - disclaims accuracy - clean 7Aug17
 * Meant to Be (Nothing But You album)
 * - unclear - RSN discussions - disclaimer
 * nothing
 * nothing
 * nothing
 * nothing
 * - unclear - RSN discussions - disclaimer
 * nothing
 * nothing
 * nothing
 * nothing
 * - unclear - RSN discussions - disclaimer
 * nothing
 * nothing
 * nothing
 * nothing
 * nothing


 * Lilah Parsons


 * not reliable per graphiq terms

*