User:HirokiTomida/Japanese rice fish/ShaoweiHuo Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * HirokiTomida
 * Japanese rice fish

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer?
 * Yes.
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
 * Yes, the first sentence describes the name and the family of Japanese rice fish.
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
 * The lead does not include all sections, such as the scientific use of rice fish.
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
 * Tomida mentioned the law which banned the market of rice fish in EU, but not including it in the article.
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?
 * i think the other parts are concise.

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic?
 * Yes.
 * Is the content added up-to-date?
 * Yes, most of them are published in recent years.
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?
 * i personally think that the reproduction cycle and the habits of rice fish, such as in what types of habitat do they live could be briefly talked about. Also, for the "aquarium keeping in Japan", i think it would be better if included some real numbers or examples.

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral?
 * Yes
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * No
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * Only the aquarium keeping part, i would say it is underrepresented.
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?
 * No, it is neutral.

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
 * Yes
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * Yes
 * Are the sources current?
 * Yes
 * Check a few links. Do they work?
 * Yes

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
 * Yes
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors?
 * Not seeing any grammatical or spelling errors, but the miss of citation.
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?
 * Yes

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
 * Yes
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * Yes
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * Yes
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?
 * Yes