User:HisSpaceResearch/Archive 2

Chris Faller
I've talked with the admin who salted Chris Faller and gotten it unprotected per your statement on the talk page. If you think it's worth creating now, I've found a potential reference you can use on the page using google news: I can't immediately find anything else, but if you need any help with this article, feel free to ask on my talk page. Happy editing, i kan reed 20:58, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
 * here
 * Edit: also this page

AfD nomination of Illegal number
An editor has nominated Illegal number, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 18:30, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

Chump
Thanks for the work you did on this article. Is there some way to get the lamb chump definition in there? Thanks! -Yupik 19:11, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Put it in yourself if you can attribute it to reliable sources--h i s  s p a c e   r e s e a r c h 19:15, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Ok, thanks. -Yupik 19:54, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

RE: Bubbles the Clown
Thanks for the positive response. I took a lot of information from other Test Card related pages and put it all on there. Thanks for framing the picture, it looks so much better.

Riatsila 15:27, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:BubblesTCF.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:BubblesTCF.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 13:06, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

TfD nomination of Template:Personalideas
Template:Personalideas has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. — Salaskan 18:52, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

I have just made an argument in favor of your template. Please, change your view so that my point is not weakened. If you don't. I will respect that. Cheers.Jrod2 21:32, 11 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Hi again, I have made another argument in favor of your template. I wouldn't mind adopting your template and making and argument in favor. But, can I ask what made you create it in the first place?--Jrod2 22:59, 11 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Thanks! If we can get it approved with more consensus, it will save a lot of trouble to a lot of people like me in the future. Let's keep our fingers crossed. God bless.--Jrod2 23:14, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:BubblesTCJ.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:BubblesTCJ.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 06:27, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

Email regarding Bubbles the Clowns history
I just recieved the reply to the email I sent the BBC yesterday, and I am rather disapointed. All I got was a very long-winded apology about 'how they could not find any results on their database regarding my question.' I am now going to email them about whether they have a Test Card Documentary to show.

Riatsila 15:15, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Hmm, OK.--h i s  s p a c e   r e s e a r c h 15:22, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

Image:Scratch4Cash.JPG
Hello HisSpaceResearch, an automated process has found an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, such as fair use. The image (Image:Scratch4Cash.JPG) was found at the following location: User:HisSpaceResearch. This image or media will be removed per statement number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg, so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. The image that was replaced will not be automatically deleted, but it could be deleted at a later date. Articles using the same image should not be affected by my edits. I ask you to please not readd the image to your userpage and could consider finding a replacement image licensed under either the Creative Commons or GFDL license or released to the public domain. Thanks for your attention and cooperation. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 08:38, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

Hey HisSpace
We lost the template (Personalideas). But, maybe if you do it the same way except more toned down and mentioning also about the issue with the newbies. If you do, I will make an argument in favor of it, all over again. What do you say? Jrod2 00:18, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
 * If you want to make something like it again, go ahead. I won't for now.--h i s  s p a c e   r e s e a r c h 15:03, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

WP:YOUSUCK
fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason: crossnamespace redirect --Android Mouse Bot 2 12:47, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

Aden Abdullah Osman Daar
As far as I was told, the word "born" is only supposed to appear in the lifespan bracket introduction when the person in question is alive, for the same reasons that their place birth is only supposed to appear then when alive. Keeping just the lifespan in the brackets looks neater and more encyclopedic, so I've been told, (and I also happen to agree, unless there's a translation issue ala Sadaam Hussein). On carefully watched and featured articles (Jerry Falwell, Gerald Ford for example) this seems to be the accepted style. Also, when there is a lifespan (1908 - May 19, 2007) the words "born" and "died" are implied. Adding them would seem to be redundant. Canadian Paul 20:41, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

Image:TeabaggingArtistsImpression.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:TeabaggingArtistsImpression.jpg, has been listed at. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --DCrazy talk/contrib 00:45, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

Small cleanup icon
I noticed your comments over on Why tags are evil from some time ago. I thought you might be interested in a new, unobtrusive clean-up icon created by User:Notmyhandle, which I think would be another good step in the same spirit as that taken by the small sp icon that has become so prominent, such as on White House. You can take a look at the new, smaller, cleanup icon here, and if you like what you see, please leave a comment here. I think that tags, though they serve some purpose, have really become visual pollution, and we need more of these smaller icons. Cheers. Unschool 07:42, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

Your recent edit to Size queen (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 21:57, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

Bubbles the Clown
I was about to ad a ref to this about Carole Hersee marking the 40th anniversary of test card F - when I noticed the Richard Whiteley ref - am I missing something here? Zir 19:34, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
 * I'm reading the article you've just linked me to. Seems interesting. I don't think you're missing anything...--h i s  s p a c e   r e s e a r c h 21:26, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
 * I meant, why does Richard Whiteley's obit feature as a ref in the article - what's the significance? Zir 10:50, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
 * It does cite the 70,000 hours thing. But yeah, I do think now that the Bubbles article really is just a content fork of Test Card F.-h i s  s p a c e   r e s e a r c h 10:50, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Oh, I dunno - this article could make him a star! Zir 11:21, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
 * I've clarified the Richard Whiteley ref. by adding that quote and tweaked tech. termsZir 11:05, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Cool, thanks. Do you want to bring this discussion to the Bubbles talk page?-h i s  s p a c e   r e s e a r c h 11:06, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Nah - said what I needed to in "Do not merge with Test Card F!" and the direction that the article might take. I presume that Carole might still have Bubbles - but will ask her sister Gill next time I see her (we work together occasionally) - and also if it's possible to get a non-copyright photo.Zir 11:19, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Wow, that's quite something. Thanks.-h i s  s p a c e   r e s e a r c h 11:22, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
 * S'alright - noticed that you've just changed Carole → Hersee, in true journo style! Prefer Carole, myself, knowing there were two sisters at school at the same time - but then I'm just a pedant!Zir 11:28, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Well, Wikipedia is a formal encyclopedia after all. I just get this feeling somehow that Bubbles the Clown is inevitably a content fork of Test Card F. And it's not as if Carole's sister is mentioned at all in the Bubbles article right now...-h i s  s p a c e   r e s e a r c h 11:30, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

Big Brother 2007 (UK) Discussion
Yeah just a little for something so minor. Maybe I was a little over-zealous with the WP:FORUM. I try to watch out for it from new users, but as you have used wikipedia for as long time I should have just let it slide, and realised that you had the article in mind. I was just slightly worried if we went down that road suddenly the talk page would get flooded with all sorts of speculation. Sorry ;-) John Hayes 10:35, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

GA review
Just wanted to make sure that you knew that Bubbles the Clown is currently on hold under GA review. The comments are on the talk page. After five days I'll review the article again. CLA 11:18, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Can-Tago Mago (album cover).jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Can-Tago Mago (album cover).jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 18:40, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Can-Soundtracks (album cover).jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Can-Soundtracks (album cover).jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 18:40, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Can-Soon Over Babaluma (album cover).jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Can-Soon Over Babaluma (album cover).jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 18:41, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Can-Saw Delight (album cover).jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Can-Saw Delight (album cover).jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 18:41, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Can-Rite Time (album cover).jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Can-Rite Time (album cover).jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 18:41, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Can-Out of Reach (album cover).jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Can-Out of Reach (album cover).jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 18:41, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Can-Landed (album cover).jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Can-Landed (album cover).jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 18:42, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Can-Flow Motion (album cover).jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Can-Flow Motion (album cover).jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 18:42, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Can-Delay 1968 (album cover).jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Can-Delay 1968 (album cover).jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 18:42, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Can-Can (album cover).jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Can-Can (album cover).jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 18:42, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

history
hey all look at www.macmillan.com.au it is cool ???? jake

KRU Records
Could you please revisit Articles for deletion/KRU Records? I added some references to KRU Records --Eastmain 01:33, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 15:07, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

Glimmer Twins article
Most of the Stones related articles are either undergoing massive re-writes or have yet to be finished and are thus stubs. It will likely be worth it when it is finished. Stan weller 20:45, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

OK Computer
Thanks for passing the article and for your comments; both are very much appreciated. I'll take a look at King Crimson soon. ErleGrey (talk) 21:25, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

Bauhaus
Hi... I assumed you didn't mean to delete almost the entire Bauhaus article. You might want to revisit it, as I'm not sure what edit you were trying so I just reverted it.&mdash; Chowbok  ☠  16:08, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

Sources for James Brown article
I noticed that you placed a tag on the article. In addition to the 98 references already noted for the article, which references are you specifically referring too? I also read the Talk page, but did not see anything there from you about requiring additional references for the article.  →   Lwalt ♦ talk 20:34, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Got your message, but need specifics...that is, specific instances (rather than the general expression "justified" (anything can be or not be justified, which is not questioned in this case). In other words, what type of references are you referring to that are needed in addition to what has been provided?  →   Lwalt ♦ talk 20:39, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Got your recent message...thanks for the feedback about the need for additional sources.  →   Lwalt ♦ talk 21:06, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:The_Future_Sound_of_London_Lifeforms_album_cover.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:The_Future_Sound_of_London_Lifeforms_album_cover.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Videmus Omnia 18:05, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

Gweek
Could you be more specific in your objection to the references in the article on the village and civil parish of Gweek, please? See Talk:Gweek for my comments=== Vernon White (talk)  10:02, 4 July 2007 (UTC)