User:Historical-Account

Consensus is important. In the interest of advancing knowledge and intellectual cohesion it is important for editors to stick to factual information and avoid opinionated descriptors intended to discredit those subjects whose ideology may not line up with the editors. It is very important for us as Editors and as a society to remove such tactics of subtle attacks. For example: If a piece is written on Kent Hovind describing him as “an evangelical preacher with beliefs in biblical accounts and he rejects the evolution theory and the timelines associated.” Then an editor adds in descriptors like “a (radical) evangelical with (unorthodox) beliefs in biblical accounts”, this removes unbiased intellect and becomes an opinion hit piece. This is vile to its core and has no place in intellectual circles. We as mensches / humans must restrain from such actions. The very moral compass by which we navigate as a society is tainted by these literary acts.