User:HitroMilanese/Archive15

 

Your answer on the talk page
If you can see the discussion page, I have given an answer about Amir Sarkhosh Thank you.Somali admon (talk) 10:31, 3 August 2020 (UTC)

draft
hello Sorry, I had a question In your opinion, this article is not good in terms of wiki and is not a complete article.؟؟؟؟ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 5.113.139.105 (talk) 21:35, 9 August 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Animal Scream for speedy deletion
Just wanted to apologize for removing the speedy deletion notice. I was editing it and must have removed it mistakenly. Sorry. — Preceding unsigned comment added by StripedCucumberBeetle (talk • contribs) 06:23, 10 August 2020 (UTC)


 * , Hello there, No problem. The article is nominated for deletion, so you can take part in the discussion. I note that you have written your opinion on talk page of the discussion. It will be better if you move your opinion to discussion page below the deletion rationale. The decision of deletion will be taken after considering all the opinions. If your rationale for keeping this article will be policy based then this article will not be deleted. See WP:AFDFORMAT for more instructions. Regards. Hitro talk 06:47, 12 August 2020 (UTC)

Tomas Madl
Hi there.

You have declined my page about Tomas Madl when you said that more citation is needed. Could you provide me some more info about what exactly should I add or change? I have waited weeks for review and I want to make sure that the second time the result is different. Thanks! Petexner (talk) 08:35, 10 August 2020 (UTC)petexner


 * , Hello there, in my opinion, the draft is lacking sufficient references to demonstrate notability. Sections "Social Activity" and "Life" are totally unsourced. Please check WP:LIVE in order to understand the policy related to biography of a living person. Also see WP:GNG and WP:ANYBIO to understand the criteria for demonstrating notability. Regards. Hitro talk 06:53, 12 August 2020 (UTC)

Rejected Wikipedia Article
Hi, you rejected my wikipedia article suggestion. Thank you for our valuable feedback.

I've updated it fixing the issues you pointed out. Do you mind re-reviewing it for me? Thanks so much!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:PathCheck Sheshanks2020 (talk) 21:17, 22 August 2020 (UTC) Sheshanks2020

Hey, thanks for your re-review! Could you explain more why the sources aren't sufficient for being "published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject"? Take these in particular:

- There is ~ 4 paragraphs about pathcheck (formerly known as safe paths) in this NY Times article: https://www.nytimes.com/2020/06/03/health/coronavirus-contact-tracing-apps.html - This WSJ video features the founder of pathcheck, Ramesh Raskar during the entire duration of the video, talking about the org https://www.wsj.com/video/events/surveillance-and-our-privacy/79EDDCD4-A76A-475C-B61D-F2FAA9A304EC.html - This article is completely about Pathcheck/Safe-Paths https://www.techrepublic.com/article/how-an-mit-spin-off-is-using-contact-tracing-to-fight-covid-19-and-so-can-you/ - This was Ramesh Raskar's speech to Congress about PathCheck's contact tracing methods: https://financialservices.house.gov/uploadedfiles/hhrg-116-ba00-wstate-raskarr-20200708-u1.pdf

I think you might not have realized that PathCheck was formerly known as Safe Paths. Please let me know how I can improve, I'm really excited to potentially publish this page. Thanks!

Sheshanks2020 (talk) 05:42, 24 August 2020 (UTC) Sheshank


 * , Hello there,


 * Please note that a company, corporation, organization, group, product, or service is notable if it has been the subject of significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Keeping aside the self published sources, none of the presented sources are particularly covering the topic. Passing mentions and routine coverage are not enough to demonstrate notability. You may want to see WP:ILC. The references should be presented inline to the claims made within the article. Please fix these issues and resubmit the draft. See WP:GNG and WP:ORG to know the criteria of inclusion. Regards. Hitro talk 06:00, 24 August 2020 (UTC)

Thank you for your response. I've updated the article with more information with your feedback and another experienced Wikipedia users feedback. Please let me know what you think.They've commented below the review block on my page with their thoughts Sheshanks2020 (talk) 07:04, 24 August 2020 (UTC)


 * , Hello there, I will leave it for another reviewer as I am not able to find significant coverage in either NYT or WSJ. Fresh eyes are better for this one. Regards Hitro<b style="color:#FF00FF; font-family:courier; font-size:small"> talk</b> 07:09, 25 August 2020 (UTC)

Hi HitroMilanese,
how is it possible to publish reliable informations about a software without using self sources ? For example the Wikipedia page of ZBrush ( another software ) use ONLY self source https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ZBrush — Preceding unsigned comment added by U2Bleank (talk • contribs) 10:05, 24 August 2020 (UTC)


 * , Hi there, I have tagged that article for reference improvement. However, please see Other stuff exists. Regarding the draft, the self published sources may be used as auxiliary sourcing but the draft should not be based on company's press release or official website. For establishing notability, there must be one or two independent and reliable sources. Drafts that fail to establish notability are likely to be declined. Regards. <b style="color:Green; font-family:Times New Roman">Hitro</b><b style="color:#FF00FF; font-family:courier; font-size:small"> talk</b> 07:17, 25 August 2020 (UTC)

Reviewing the Draft of Rahul Mittra
Respected Sir, Around 3 weeks back, I had published a draft on Rahul Mittra and it was rejected by you. I had gone through your comments and I accept the errors in the previous draft. I had re-submitted the article after 1-2 days of rejection with the best possible correction, but it has not being reviewed. I would like you to review the content once, so that I can come across the fact whether my draft is eligible to be a part of Wikipedia or not. I hope you do the needful. I hope it isn't an issue to reach you like this. If it is, do forgive me and I won't repeat it again. Warm Regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by Priyanshu1817 (talk • contribs) 14:34, 24 August 2020 (UTC)

I would like to provide you with the link of the draft. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Rahul_Mittra Warm Regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by Priyanshu1817 (talk • contribs) 05:38, 25 August 2020 (UTC)


 * , Hello there, Thank you for updating the draft. I see it is already submitted for review. If this does not get reviewed by any other reviewer then I will look into this in coming two days. Regards. <b style="color:Green; font-family:Times New Roman">Hitro</b><b style="color:#FF00FF; font-family:courier; font-size:small"> talk</b> 15:02, 25 August 2020 (UTC)

Respected Sir, I would like to inform you that till now the draft has not being reviewed, and it has being more than 3 weeks now. I hope you can do the needful and check out the draft and review it. Thank you for your time. Warm Regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by Priyanshu1817 (talk • contribs) 02:38, 27 August 2020 (UTC)

Hi Sir, What's the update regarding the article? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Priyanshu1817 (talk • contribs) 14:55, 28 August 2020 (UTC)


 * , Hello there, to be frank, I am not totally convinced with the sources that are presented. Except Deccan Chronicle, no other presented source is covering the topic in-depth. The awards are not notable as per Wikipedia standards. It would be better if you introduce more sources where the subject has received significant coverage. Another set of eyes may have different view that is why I have not declined nor accepted the draft. Regards. <b style="color:Green; font-family:Times New Roman">Hitro</b><b style="color:#FF00FF; font-family:courier; font-size:small"> talk</b> 15:04, 28 August 2020 (UTC)

Hi, Thank you for your review. I will try to find more sources but if I am not able to, then are there any chances that the article might be accepted? Can you let me know more about it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Priyanshu1817 (talk • contribs) 15:07, 28 August 2020 (UTC)


 * , Please see WP:GNG and WP:FILMMAKER. The topic must satisfy either of these two criteria of notability for acceptance. Introduction for sources will help in establishing notability. Regards. <b style="color:Green; font-family:Times New Roman">Hitro</b><b style="color:#FF00FF; font-family:courier; font-size:small"> talk</b> 15:12, 28 August 2020 (UTC)

Hi, Thank you for your advice! I have added more reference links in the article. Can you check it once? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Priyanshu1817 (talk • contribs) 15:47, 28 August 2020 (UTC)

Hi, Thank you so much for accepting the article. You have being a great help in improving the article and I have also learnt a lot from your advice. Thank you once again — Preceding unsigned comment added by Priyanshu1817 (talk • contribs) 08:20, 29 August 2020 (UTC)

Review Please
i created pages but no one reviewed Xtools Pages --Prasanth202 (talk) 16:18, 25 August 2020 (UTC)


 * , Hello there, what pages are you talking about? <b style="color:Green; font-family:Times New Roman">Hitro</b><b style="color:#FF00FF; font-family:courier; font-size:small"> talk</b> 16:20, 25 August 2020 (UTC)

disambiguation pages i created Sorry for English --Prasanth202 (talk) 16:22, 25 August 2020 (UTC)


 * , Don't worry. It will be reviewed sooner or later. Regards.<b style="color:Green; font-family:Times New Roman">Hitro</b><b style="color:#FF00FF; font-family:courier; font-size:small"> talk</b> 16:53, 25 August 2020 (UTC)

Resubmission
Hi, I have republished the article with the changes you have mentioned. Can you please review it again and let me know. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Akshita Manocha (talk • contribs) 13:36, 28 August 2020 (UTC)


 * Hello there, thank you for your contribution. I will leave this for another reviewer as I am still not convinced that notability has been demonstrated with the introduction of newly added sources either. Regards. <b style="color:Green; font-family:Times New Roman">Hitro</b><b style="color:#FF00FF; font-family:courier; font-size:small"> talk</b> 14:54, 28 August 2020 (UTC)

more clarity needed
HI,

I have noticed that artist https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Sajan_Mani rejected by you. Why do you think it is advertising ? could you please elaborate a bit

https://hausderkunst.de/en/notes/sajan-mani http://kampalabiennale.org/sajan-mani/ https://indiaartfair.in/sajan-mani-this-silence-is-violence https://apa-b.org/2003/12/23/sajan-mani/ https://www.deccanchronicle.com/lifestyle/viral-and-trending/171016/black-beauty-sajan-mani-talks-about-his-performance.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by Clubmate2019 (talk • contribs) 19:09, 29 August 2020 (UTC)


 * , Hello there, all encyclopedic content on Wikipedia must be written from a neutral point of view without promoting or praising the subject in any manner. The said draft is promoting the topic in each and every paragraph. The draft should be rewritten in formal tone. Notability is not being questioned currently, so you are not required to provide me with sources. Regards. <b style="color:Green; font-family:Times New Roman">Hitro</b><b style="color:#FF00FF; font-family:courier; font-size:small"> talk</b> 06:23, 30 August 2020 (UTC)

FF Rarri
In your opinion what do I need to add to get my Wikipedia accepted I been trying to get live for months — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1700:19C1:B4F0:18AF:7E02:B9B6:B9CC (talk) 15:35, 30 August 2020 (UTC)


 * Hello there, do you know the artist personally? Please login before replying. <b style="color:Green; font-family:Times New Roman">Hitro</b><b style="color:#FF00FF; font-family:courier; font-size:small"> talk</b> 06:22, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

Resubmission
I've resubmitted the draft with the changes you have suggested. Please review it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheSciFiWonder (talk • contribs) 15:17, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

article
Hello, I have been trying to create an article for some time, which is deleted by a very reputable person, Stolly, for no reason, despite the reputation, because a bad user writes it.I ask you to create it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.162.203.9 (talk) 06:41, 2 September 2020 (UTC)


 * Hello there, so far my thoughts are concerned, it has been deleted for a very genuine reasons. I am sorry I can not help you in this matter. You may contact the deleting admin on their talk page. Regards. <b style="color:Green; font-family:Times New Roman">Hitro</b><b style="color:#FF00FF; font-family:courier; font-size:small"> talk</b> 06:48, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

thanks!
Hey, thanks so much for approving my article on Andrew McMillan (poet). I have another article pending approval, if you wouldn't mind looking at it? I'd really appreciate it. [] Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Inchicore90 (talk • contribs) 14:30, 4 September 2020 (UTC)


 * , Hi there, it appears that you have already created the article at main space. Regards. <b style="color:Green; font-family:Times New Roman">Hitro</b><b style="color:#FF00FF; font-family:courier; font-size:small"> talk</b> 13:09, 6 September 2020 (UTC)

About Aashu Patel Article
Hello HitroMolanese,

Your comment about this https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Aashu_Patel article is highly appreciable. As this article is about the journalist that's why I can not gather more articles about this, and not by him. I suggest you check other journalists and authors' articles in Wikipedia and compare the authenticity and reliable source of those articles with the article I did prepare. Please check https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dhruv_Bhatt and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kanti_Bhatt and please make your comment accordingly. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cgoju (talk • contribs) 13:34, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Hello there,
 * Hello there,


 * At Wikipedia, there are set guidelines for notability and drafts are accepted and declined on basis of those guidelines. WP:GNG and WP:JOURNALIST apply for the drafts related to a journalist. For acceptance, the subject must fulfill either of those criteria. Secondly, even basic inclusion rules, such as notability and the use of reliable sources, don't actually provide a mechanism to stop somebody from trying to create an article about a topic that fails them. Those rules govern whether or not the article is allowed on Wikipedia once it's here, but they do not actually make it impossible for someone to start an article about a non-notable topic in the first place. And even when such an article does get created, the more responsible editors have to actually see it before it can get dealt with. Non-notable articles are deleted at Wikipedia on regular basis, some were deleted after 8 to 10 years of existence.


 * Anyhow, I just checked both the articles mentioned by you. Dhruv Bhatt has received Sahitya Akademi Award, which is a credible claim of significance in itself. Kanti Bhatt is meeting WP:GNG, simple google search is emitting multiple significant coverage about him.
 * The burden to establish notability lies with the draft creator. Once you demonstrate notability with proper sourcing, the draft will be accepted. Regards. <b style="color:Green; font-family:Times New Roman">Hitro</b><b style="color:#FF00FF; font-family:courier; font-size:small"> talk</b> 14:08, 6 September 2020 (UTC)


 * Hello there,
 * Hello there,


 * I did make changes as you suggested, I did remove the portion of the article that does not have a supportive citation and also added some citation. Please do check once and let me know how can i make it batter into the future. thanks a lot for the help.


 * , Hello there, I guess the changes that you made are not enough to demonstrate notability. I can still see there are excessive references from primary sources. A reviewer has requested WP:THREE, so please indicate the three best sources where the topic has received significant coverage that will help in verifying the notability claims. Regards. <b style="color:Green; font-family:Times New Roman">Hitro</b><b style="color:#FF00FF; font-family:courier; font-size:small"> talk</b> 06:54, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

References Provided
As per your request we provided references from 2 independent and reliable sources where it is verified that the subject has won an Emmy award. If you need anything else, please let us know. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tbpusa (talk • contribs) 18:15, 6 September 2020 (UTC)


 * Hello there,
 * Listed sources are not reliable. IMDb is not considered reliable for verification at Wikipedia. Please see WP:RS. Regards. <b style="color:Green; font-family:Times New Roman">Hitro</b><b style="color:#FF00FF; font-family:courier; font-size:small"> talk</b> 07:00, 8 September 2020 (UTC)

Reviewing Marina Bondarko model Draft page
Greetings HitroMilanese, I've fixed issues which you mentioned in the morning, on Draft:Marina Bondarko, do check it out. As far as notability has concerned model being an Belarusian, has news in Indonesian & Vietnamese newspapers, this suggests model passes General Notability Guidelines... Shelikesme (talk) 09:19, 8 September 2020 (UTC)

Query regarding Wikipedia page - Bansi Parimu
Hello, I wanted to create a wikipedia page in my late Dad's name and I also maintain a website in his name (www.bansiparimu.com) my submission was rejected I think because I copied the bio from his website. The website is maintained by me as well, what do I need to do in order to have the page approved? Regards, Jheelaf Bansi Parimu (talk) 01:22, 12 September 2020 (UTC)


 * , Hello there, thank you for your contribution.


 * Please know that the conflict of interest (COI) editing is strongly discouraged on Wikipedia. Therefore, make yourself aware of the Wikipedia guidelines regarding COI before editing.


 * Secondly, Wikipedia has strict policies related to the copyright violations. Please refer to Copyright violations to understand what sort of materials are accepted on Wikipedia. At the bottom of the home page of the website, www.bansiparimu.com, it is clearly mentioned that the contents are copyrighted. Wikipedia can not accept such contents.


 * If you are the owner of the said website and you want to grant permission to copy materials then please refer to this link and follow the procedure to release textual content. You can also visit Teahouse for further assistance.


 * Apart from that, I also want to inform you that the Wikipedia articles should be based on reliable, published sources which are independent of the subject. You must present references in independent and reliable sources before resubmitting the draft. Currently, listed sources are not enough to demonstrate notability. Regards. <b style="color:Green; font-family:Times New Roman">Hitro</b><b style="color:#FF00FF; font-family:courier; font-size:small"> talk</b> 10:03, 12 September 2020 (UTC)

Hi, thanks for reviewing my article, I have added lot of reliable article links in the reference to support the biography after the first deletion, Will you plz let me know what kind of details are you expecting

Regarding Eleiko
Hi, You wrote: "Please see WP:CORPDEPTH. A company, corporation, organization, group, product, or service is notable if it has been the subject of significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject. It is as simple as that. Resubmitting without focusing on required resources is futile."

Eleiko is a market leader, present on 185 markets around the world, partner of three major strength strength sport federations. European Business is a respected German B2B publication and the same goes for Mekpoint. How can you argue that those publications, as well as the sport federations themselves, are not reliable secondary sources?


 * , Hello there, thank you for your message. Please make sure to sign your post that helps in identifying the user.


 * To be honest, the presented sources evidently prove that the company exists and it is prominent but it does not demonstrate notability. Please add multiple sources where the company has received significant coverage. The draft has been flagged for paid editing so the reviewers are going to scrutinize each and every claim at toughest level. And if you have Conflict of Interest then see WP:COIEDIT and WP:NOPR before editing & disclose your affiliation accordingly, if you have not done so. Regards. <b style="color:Green; font-family:Times New Roman">Hitro</b><b style="color:#FF00FF; font-family:courier; font-size:small"> talk</b> 07:20, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

Hello! Thank you for replying so quickly and giving me an insight on the problem. The thing is Eleiko is one of the leading companies, if not the leading company, in this industry. It has however been hard to find sources apart from blogs, online stores etc and other industry related sites and I figured they didn't "count" as reliable sources. I have also found really good Swedish sources but I was uncertain if I could use those. What's your opinion on that? This article for example (https://www.di.se/bors/telegram/78aac9e4-180c-4410-8e9d-653c04397244) was published in Sweden's leading business newspaper (i.e. the Swedish WSJ or the Swedish Financial Times) and it clearly states that Eleiko is a market leader. Can I use that source? Furthermore, I have no conflict of interest and I wasn't paid to do this (although I wish I was given the time I've spent trying to get this bloody article published:-)), I'm just a keen Swedish weightlifter. I'm uncertain how to sign my posts but I'll try. Zooboy0964


 * No, problem. You may add this source and more to the draft. And as per WP:THREE, leave a comment at the draft comment section or draft talk page indicating the three best sources. The reviewers will consider these sources and take their decision based on them. Make sure to submit the draft after doing so. Regards. <b style="color:Green; font-family:Times New Roman">Hitro</b><b style="color:#FF00FF; font-family:courier; font-size:small"> talk</b> 06:04, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

About Swami Vivekananda Medical Mission
Hi, the new page I created was rejected because of 'lack of external references'. Actually I have provided 20 external citations and references. I have linked many of them to specific points in the narration as references. Hope this revised submission would meet with the Wikipedia standards. Would appreciate your feedback please.Lekshmis2002 (talk) 11:25, 19 September 2020 (UTC)


 * , Hello there, I guess you are talking about Draft:Swami Vivekananda Medical Mission. I declined it because it is not written in a neutral tone. It is promoting the subject which is not acceptable at Wikipedia. It is nearly an advertisement which is not suitable for an encyclopedia. Please see WP:TONE and fix the tone of the article. I will suggest to rewrite this draft from scratch. "Lack of references" is a secondary problem at the moment. Regards. <b style="color:Green; font-family:Times New Roman">Hitro</b><b style="color:#FF00FF; font-family:courier; font-size:small"> talk</b> 06:10, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

Hi, I read WP:Tone in detail. I have made an attempt to remove all adjectives and phrases that made it appear like promotion or 'advertorial'. I hope it is neutral in tone now. What remains now are statement of facts. There are a few statements on impact of this organisation on the community, which are in the nature of assessments. There are no sources for such assessments in public domain. These have been left as it is because in my view these highlight the uniqueness of this organisation as such and differentiates it from other organisations working in this field. i.e., methodology, holistic view and impact. Where impact is tangible and measurable, I will add some statistics. Where impact is intangible, it has to be described in words, minus the hyperbole or promotion. Did I understand your objection correctly? Would appreciate your feedback. If there is anything needs to be improved with respect to the 'Tone', could you please give one or two specific examples? Lekshmis2002 (talk) 06:54, 20 September 2020 (UTC)


 * Hello there, first of all, you should understand that articles at Wikipedia should be based on reliable, independent, published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. This means that we publish the opinions only of reliable authors, and not the opinions of Wikipedians who have read and interpreted primary source material for themselves. If there is no source then that claim is not acceptable at Wikipedia. You should better remove such claims. See No original research. Secondly, large part of the draft is still promotional and praising the organization. We do not need every single detail about the organization in Wikipedia page. Sections like "WHAT IS UNIQUE ABOUT SVMM?" & "A Brief History of SVMM", is not at all encyclopedic. Such info is suitable for the official website. Wikipedia articles should be informative, written in a neutral point of view. You may check International Society for Krishna Consciousness, this is not the best article but still you can take this as an example for writing an acceptable draft. Conclusively, entire draft should be rewritten with inline citation from reliable source. Maintain WP:NPOV and remove indiscriminate details from the content. Regards. <b style="color:Green; font-family:Times New Roman">Hitro</b><b style="color:#FF00FF; font-family:courier; font-size:small"> talk</b> 07:19, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

Visual editing
Thank you for the feedback on my entry. I want to improve it, but it showed up without the visual editing option in "Edit", but only "Edit source". Could you please make Visual editing possible? It will take so long to figure out the other way of editing. Thanks a lot. Sand7043 11:14, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
 * , Hello there, I do not have expertise in technical aspect of Wikipedia. I suggest you to visit Teahouse and ask this question there. Regards. <b style="color:Green; font-family:Times New Roman">Hitro</b><b style="color:#FF00FF; font-family:courier; font-size:small"> talk</b> 07:52, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Pero Janjić
Hello,

Per your comment, I edited the article to remove the reference about Hall Of Fame. G. Radoznali (talk) 15:52, 22 September 2020 (UTC)


 * , Hello there, I guess I will opt to leave it for another reviewer. IMHO, the Hall of Fame claim was demonstrating notability clearly. Regards. <b style="color:Green; font-family:Times New Roman">Hitro</b><b style="color:#FF00FF; font-family:courier; font-size:small"> talk</b> 07:57, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

Join the Months of African Cinema Global Contest!
Ýou can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list

SPI
please see Sockpuppet investigations/Vallabharebel and comment as you see fit. There have been so many SPIs for this person that it is difficult keeping track which is the oldest! Spike &#39;em (talk) 09:38, 26 September 2020 (UTC)


 * , Hello there, thank you for the info and sorry for the delayed response. Anyhow, the issue appears to be dealt with. Regards. <b style="color:Green; font-family:Times New Roman">Hitro</b><b style="color:#FF00FF; font-family:courier; font-size:small"> talk</b> 07:36, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

Declined article: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:OVO-TECH - issues resolved
Hello HitroMilanese and thank you for the speedy review! I just want to let you know I have just added additional references which are totally independent of our company: https://www.wfxg.com/story/42381008/egg-processing-machinery-market-analysis-2020-global-industry-detailed-analysis-size-share-overview-by-revenue-competitive-landscape-key-regions-and https://strefabiznesu.pl/urzadzenie-do-dezynfekcji-wyprodukowane-w-starachowickiej-firmie-pomoze-w-walce-z-koronawirusem-w-szpitalu-zdjecia/ar/c3-15115610 (article in Polish)

Could you please take another look and let me know if the article is suitable for publishing now? :) Oh and by the way, Forza Milan! — Preceding unsigned comment added by McG4evah (talk • contribs) 09:44, 30 September 2020 (UTC)


 * , Hello there, one of the the links that you provided above is not working at the moment and the other is not a "significant coverage" as required per WP:CORPDEPTH. Passing mentions and routine coverage are not going to demonstrate notability. You may want to see WP:NCORP. Apart from sourcing issues, there are excessive external links within the body of the content. You should fix them as per WP:REFB. Proper referencing technique and inline citations help the reviewers to verify the claims of notability. Forza Milan! :) <b style="color:Green; font-family:Times New Roman">Hitro</b><b style="color:#FF00FF; font-family:courier; font-size:small"> talk</b> 06:47, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

Request on 16:48:03, 1 October 2020 for assistance on AfC submission by RzU78pzy12
RzU78pzy12 (talk) 16:48, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

Dear Hitro,

You have recently rejected my article on Sucharit Bhakdi, and claimed as a reason that he is not a notable scholar. That is a very remarkable claim, because he is one of Germany's leading scientist in his field who has won many scientific prizes, as I say in my article. You can convince yourself of this fact by looking at his German Wikipedia page. I ask that this decision is revoked and the page is published.

Best regards,

RzU78pzy12


 * , Hello there,


 * The reason for my decline is the absence of reliable references. It does not matter how prominent the subject is in their field, unless you demonstrate notability as per WP:GNG and WP:V, the draft won't be accepted. The burden to demonstrate verifiability lies with the editor who adds or restores material, therefore add references and resubmit the draft for review. Regards. <b style="color:Green; font-family:Times New Roman">Hitro</b><b style="color:#FF00FF; font-family:courier; font-size:small"> talk</b> 07:01, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

Hi Hitro,

which facts do you dispute? Then I can add corresponding references.

Best regards,

RzU78pzy12 — Preceding unsigned comment added by RzU78pzy12 (talk • contribs) 22:38, 2 October 2020 (UTC)


 * , Hello there,
 * I am not disputing any fact. At Wikipedia, all the claims made within the article should be verifiable with independent and reliable sources. The burden to demonstrate verifiability lies with the editor who adds or restores material, and it is satisfied by providing an inline citation to a reliable source that directly supports the contribution. Attribute all quotations, and any material whose verifiability is challenged or likely to be challenged, to a reliable, published source using an inline citation. I hope this clarifies things. Regards. <b style="color:Green; font-family:Times New Roman">Hitro</b><b style="color:#FF00FF; font-family:courier; font-size:small"> talk</b> 12:31, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

Dear Hitro,

The article contains three references for the more important claims made. They are taken from the German Wikipedia and were obviously considered acceptable there. I am willing to supply references for any other claim made in the article, if you tell me which claim you are thinking of. If you do not think that the references that I have provided are good enough, please tell me why.

Best regards,

RzU78pzy12 — Preceding unsigned comment added by RzU78pzy12 (talk • contribs) 22:06, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

Dear Hitro,

As I just noticed, somebody else has just published an article about Sucharit Bhakdi, who was obviously better in handling the Wikipedia hurdles. Therefore, this discussion is no longer necessary.

Best regards,

RzU78pzy12 — Preceding unsigned comment added by RzU78pzy12 (talk • contribs) 16:48, 9 October 2020 (UTC)


 * Hello there, thank you for the message. It is good that the article has been published now. You may see the current content is well sources. Regards. <b style="color:Green; font-family:Times New Roman">Hitro</b><b style="color:#FF00FF; font-family:courier; font-size:small"> talk</b> 07:15, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

Dear Hitro,

you will understand that I see that a little differently. The sources for corresponding claims in my draft and the accepted article are exactly identical, which is not surprising, as both were taken from the German Wikipedia. That these sources were not acceptable when they came from me has nothing to do with the sources themselves, but rather with power structures within the Wikipedia hierarchy. You and the other author just have more "rights", while I do not have any. Fortunately, I had already some experience with how things go here, and consequently did not waste a lot of time with a hopeless enterprise.

Best regards,

RzU78pzy12 — Preceding unsigned comment added by RzU78pzy12 (talk • contribs) 17:25, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

Gooroo (Company)
Hi Hitro!

Thank you for reviewing my submission for Gooroo (Company). You mentioned that there are not enough in-depth coverage sources of the company, but in the Yahoo!Finance source, the IBM source, BuiltinNYC, TG Daily, Parent Herald, 74 Million, New York Business Journal, and others, Gooroo is the primary subject of the article. I was wondering if you had any advice for what type of other sources you would be looking for? I can also reduce the number of references to the website itself, i.e. primary references? There are other pages on similar companies that have even less sources (e.g. CheggTutors) so let me know what I can do!

Thank you again.

Sam — Preceding unsigned comment added by SDHubJ (talk • contribs) 15:23, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
 * , Hello Sam,


 * The sources that you mentioned above are not reliable and they are very close to spamdexing. For example: - Yahoo! Finance article is a company generated PR published on accesswire initially. Similarly TG Daily is a company sponsored post.
 * To demonstrate notability, you should present sources in accordance with WP:CORPDEPTH. You may also want to read WP:COMPANY. We get abundance of spam articles and drafts daily, therefore in order to get acceptance, it is recommended to establish notability precisely as per the guidelines. Regards. <b style="color:Green; font-family:Times New Roman">Hitro</b><b style="color:#FF00FF; font-family:courier; font-size:small"> talk</b> 12:24, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

Request on 16:44:33, 2 October 2020 for assistance on AfC submission by Sarahgungor
Hi! Thanks for taking the time to review my article submission, I appreciate it! I've reviewed the document you shared on NPOV but I'm having a hard time figuring out which parts of the article aren't neutral/formal. Would you mind providing a little more specific guidance so I can try to correct it? Thanks!

Sarahgungor (talk) 16:44, 2 October 2020 (UTC)


 * Hello there, the current content of the draft is written with the motive of praising the organization. Wikipedia articles should be informative rather than promotive. The draft appears to be a WP:BROCHURE. Apart from that, see WP:NCORP and WP:CORPDEPTH. Please demonstrate notability as per these guidelines. Best <b style="color:Green; font-family:Times New Roman">Hitro</b><b style="color:#FF00FF; font-family:courier; font-size:small"> talk</b> 06:29, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

RE:Comment
Hello I can't found the link. for "Éléments pour une vision patrimoine 2020" actually the link that is throwing 404 came from the french version of wikipedia. Thank you for tour help — Preceding unsigned comment added by Carnegie6 (talk • contribs) 17:18, 5 October 2020 (UTC)


 * , Hello there, I have retrieve the link from archive. You may check it here and use it in your draft accordingly. Regards. <b style="color:Green; font-family:Times New Roman">Hitro</b><b style="color:#FF00FF; font-family:courier; font-size:small"> talk</b> 06:02, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

Hello I have fixed the reference and THANK YOU again for the help

Hello! We are waiting your next review
Hello, I have wrote an article that has been declined by your review, the topic was Comma Entertainment

Just wanted to tell you that I'm waiting for your next review.

Thank you for letting me know why it had to be declined. But it wasn't really for the promotional purpose.

There are many people misunderstanding about our company as a K-pop agency, and they are always submitting their resume. So we wanted to state the company is 'marketing agency', not a K-pop agency.

Also, our company is viewed & commented through foreign magazines and I thought people should know about our company clearly. We have reviewed other companies like us, which are Cheil Worldwide or CJ E&M They seem to have similar post with ours, and I hope to get your next review if possible.

Thank you Wikipedian! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alex Shin KOR (talk • contribs) 05:54, 6 October 2020 (UTC)


 * , Hello there, thank you for your message. Please see WP:CORPDEPTH. The listed sources are not enough to demonstrate notability. Vimeo, Namu.wiki, Everybody wiki, etc. are all unreliable sources. The draft will not be accepted in its current form. Significant coverage in independent and reliable sources are necessary. Regards. <b style="color:Green; font-family:Times New Roman">Hitro</b><b style="color:#FF00FF; font-family:courier; font-size:small"> talk</b> 06:10, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

Article for submission.
Can you help me look through the below article and verify that it does not meet the requirements for speedy deletion

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?preload=Template%3AAfc+preload%2Fdraft&editintro=Template%3AAfC+draft+editintro&title=Draft:Ryan_Delanuez&create=Create+new+article+draft# Juwonbam (talk) 07:16, 9 October 2020 (UTC)


 * , Hi there, I believe, it is better that you communicate with the person who nominted this for deletion. Regards. <b style="color:Green; font-family:Times New Roman">Hitro</b><b style="color:#FF00FF; font-family:courier; font-size:small"> talk</b> 07:13, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for reviewing my draft!
Hi,

I recently submitted my very first draft page to Wikipedia, for The Untokening. I have resubmitted it with citations from big names in the field. NACTO, for example. I do hope you'll take a second look at it and let me know what you think.

I'm actually writing because I tried to tag it "transport" and I was having trouble with that. Can you tag it or point me to a resource that will help me sort that out?

Thanks again! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:645:100:1D20:C4AF:9372:3A73:C94B (talk) 19:57, 10 October 2020 (UTC)


 * Hello there, I guess you have added Transport WikiProject successfully. Regards. <b style="color:Green; font-family:Times New Roman">Hitro</b><b style="color:#FF00FF; font-family:courier; font-size:small"> talk</b> 07:56, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

I did! In which I learned that Wikipedia is case-sensitive. I found help chat! They also helped me look over the updated draft because I wanted it to do well if you took a second look, and I removed the citations they recommended I remove. So now it should have quality citations. Thanks again again!