User:Hjhunt/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
WikiProject Equine/Horse breeds

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this article because horses is a topic I'm interested in.

Evaluate the article
The lead includes an introductory sentence which described the article, which was information about various breeds. The introduction does give a description of the major sections and it does not include information which isn't present in the article. The lead is concise. The article's content is relevant to the topic and it is up to date. There isn't any content that blatantly does not belong and it doesn't see to have any information missing. The article does not deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps and does not address topics related to underrepresented populations.

The viewpoint of this article is neutral and there aren't any heavily biased claims. The points are overrepresented and there aren't any minority viewpoints. It does not attempt to persuade readers in favor of a certain position.

The facts are backed up by reliable sources and they are thorough. They are current sources, but aren't written by a diverse crowd of people. The sources they used are very good and credible, I couldn't find any better and the links work. The article is well written and concise, there aren't any spelling or grammatical errors. It is very well organized and broken into sections. There aren't many images provided, but the ones there do enhance the understanding of the topic and are well captioned. They adhere to the copyright regulations, but aren't laid out in a visually appealing way. There aren't any conversations happening about how to represent the topic and it is not rated, although it is on WikiProjects. The discussions are similar to how we discuss Wikipedia in class.

The articles overall status is good, it had solid information. The images could be improved but it is well developed and complete.