User:Hkolyvek/Choose an Article

Article Selection
Please list articles that you're considering for your Wikipedia assignment below. Begin to critique these articles and find relevant sources.

Option 1

 * Piltdown Man
 * The article content is relevant and written fairly neutrally. I think there could be an improvement in the citing of claims and perhaps a small improvement in the citations themselves. The article touches on the women's suffrage movement, but I think it could expand on that facet a little more. I think I could add some minor details to this page, for example a more specific look at what experts found when they did fluoride tests on the fossils.
 * Feder, Kenneth L. Frauds, Myths, and Mysteries: Science and Pseudoscience in Archaeology. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield Pub, 1995.
 * Feder, Kenneth L. Frauds, Myths, and Mysteries: Science and Pseudoscience in Archaeology. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield Pub, 1995.
 * Feder, Kenneth L. Frauds, Myths, and Mysteries: Science and Pseudoscience in Archaeology. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield Pub, 1995.

Option 2

 * Cardiff Giant
 * The article's content is relevant and educational, and seems to be pretty neutral. The citations are mostly in order and seem reliable, though there is a place where it says a citation is needed. It does not seem like the article talks about one of Wikipedia's equality gaps. Similar to the last article I looked at, I think this article could just use some minor details to fill it out more.
 * Feder, Kenneth L. Frauds, Myths, and Mysteries: Science and Pseudoscience in Archaeology . Mountain View, CA: Mayfield Pub, 1995.
 * Feder, Kenneth L. Frauds, Myths, and Mysteries: Science and Pseudoscience in Archaeology . Mountain View, CA: Mayfield Pub, 1995.
 * Feder, Kenneth L. Frauds, Myths, and Mysteries: Science and Pseudoscience in Archaeology . Mountain View, CA: Mayfield Pub, 1995.

Option 3

 * Clovis Point
 * The article is relevant, and is neutral. The citations make sense and are mostly reliable. The article talks about a historical underrepresented and misrepresented population, I think, but could do a little more to highlight them.
 * Eren, Metin I. et al. “Refuting the technological cornerstone of the Ice-Age Atlantic crossing hypothesis.” Journal of Archaeological Science 40 (2013): 2934-2941.
 * Eren, Metin I. et al. “Refuting the technological cornerstone of the Ice-Age Atlantic crossing hypothesis.” Journal of Archaeological Science 40 (2013): 2934-2941.
 * Eren, Metin I. et al. “Refuting the technological cornerstone of the Ice-Age Atlantic crossing hypothesis.” Journal of Archaeological Science 40 (2013): 2934-2941.

Option 4

 * Article title
 * Article Evaluation
 * Sources
 * Sources
 * Sources

Option 5

 * Article title
 * Article Evaluation
 * Sources
 * Sources
 * Sources