User:Hmleonard/The Great C/MichelleCHsfsu Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

I am reviewing Hmleonard


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * The Great C
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * The Great C

Lead
The lead is concise and brief about the article. It includes all topics mentioned in the article and is not overly detailed.

Content
The content seems to be up-to-date, especially with the VR Adaptation section. It does not contain irrelevant or overly detailed information. A suggestion would be to add the reviews or reception of the short story and/or VR adaptation.

Tone and Balance
The whole article appears to be in a neutral tone. There is no over- or underrepresentation of any of the content.

Sources and References
After looking through the sources and references, they appear reliable, diverse, and accurately reflected in the content. The links, old and new, work without any problems. The sources are up-to-date as they are from this year. There were a couple of sites where I found reviews/reception on the short story and the VR adaptation that might be useful.

Organization
The organization is straightforward and easy to understand. All contents are within their appropriate sections. There are only very few minor grammar errors.

Image and Media
N/A

Overall Impression
Overall, this is a good article draft. It is easy to understand and does not generate any bias, nor does it favor any sides. Everything from lead, content, organization, references, and tones are great. The one thing I suggest is to add the reception of either the short story and/or VR adaptation and to change those minor grammar errors. Otherwise, I believe it can be considered a finished article.