User:Hmr005/Media Bias/Fact Check/ChaseGil Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?
 * Hmr005


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Media Bias/Fact Check


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Even though this article is really short, it is still very informational on what media bias/fact checking is. The sources this person has I don't know what he or she has planned but this person can definitely get into depth and probably add more information to certain things. He or she can probably go more into depth about the website and get more information on the owner of the website (MBFC). But everything in this article in is relevant and nothing gets off track. The content in this article is not biased towards anything and there are no viewpoints that are not overrepresented or underrepresented in this article. The content is well written naan really easy to understand. The sources within the article are related to the topic and nothing in this article is getting off topic, and drawing my attention towards something else.