User:Hmwhite9/Esther Apuahe/Tkeogh11 Peer Review

General info
hmwhite9
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Esther Apuahe Article

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead Section:


 * 1) Updated Content: The Lead reflects the content about Esther Apuahe's career as a surgeon in Papua New Guinea.
 * 2) Introductory Sentence: The Lead contains a clear introductory sentence describing Esther Apuahe as the first woman surgeon in Papua New Guinea.
 * 3) Major Sections Brief: The Lead does not provide a brief description of the article's major sections (education, career).
 * 4) Extraneous Information: No extraneous information is present in the Lead.
 * 5) Conciseness: The Lead is concise but lacks detail on the article's structure.

Content:


 * 1) Relevance: The content about her education and career is relevant to the topic.
 * 2) Currentness: The latest update in her career section is from 2019, which may need updating.
 * 3) Completeness: The article is labeled as a stub, indicating missing content. More detailed information about her impact and contributions could enhance the article.
 * 4) Equity Gaps: The article addresses an equity gap by highlighting the achievements of a woman in a male-dominated field in Papua New Guinea.

Tone and Balance:


 * 1) Neutrality: The tone is neutral, focusing on factual information about Apuahe’s career and education.
 * 2) Bias and Representation: No apparent bias is observed. The article could benefit from additional viewpoints or impacts of her work.

Sources and References:


 * 1) Reliability and Accuracy: The references provided are from credible sources, such as news articles and official websites​​.
 * 2) Source Thoroughness: The sources are limited and may not fully reflect the available literature on Esther Apuahe.
 * 3) Currency and Diversity: The sources are somewhat current, but there is a lack of diverse authorship in the references.
 * 4) Link Functionality: The provided links are functional.

Organization:


 * 1) Writing Quality: The writing is clear and concise, though it lacks depth.
 * 2) Grammatical Accuracy: No grammatical or spelling errors are apparent.
 * 3) Structural Organization: The content is organized into relevant sections (education, career), but more detailed subdivision could improve clarity.

Images and Media: The article does not include any images or media related to Esther Apuahe, which could enhance the reader's engagement and understanding.

For New Articles: N/A

Overall Impressions:


 * 1) Quality Improvement: The article provides a basic overview of Esther Apuahe's career but could be improved with more detailed information and additional sections.
 * 2) Strengths: The article effectively highlights the pioneering achievements of Esther Apuahe in the field of surgery.
 * 3) Areas for Improvement: Expanding the article to include more about her contributions, challenges, and impact in Papua New Guinea would greatly enhance its quality. Incorporating images and media, where available and appropriate, could also improve the article.