User:HoangPham94/Evaluate an Article

Barberini Gospels
This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.


 * Barberini Gospels: Barberini Gospels
 * Briefly describe why you have chosen this article to evaluate.: I chose this article because it relate to what I am studying and I I want to better understand about Medieval periods.

Lead:Barberini Gospels

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? Yes, it does.
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? Yes, it does.
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? No, it does not.
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? Concise.

Content

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic? Yes, it is.
 * Is the content up-to-date? Yes, it is.
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? No, it is not.

Tone and Balance

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article neutral? No, it is not.
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? No, there are not.
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? No, there are not.
 * Does the article attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? No, it does not.

Sources and References

 * Guiding questions


 * Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? Yes, there are.
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? Yes, there are.
 * Are the sources current? No,they are not.
 * Check a few links. Do they work? Yes, some of them are still working.

Organization

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? Yes, it is.
 * Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors? No, it does not! I believe.
 * Is the article well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? Yes, it is.

Images and Media

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? No, it does not.
 * Are images well-captioned? NA
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations? NA
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way? NA

Checking the talk page

 * Guiding questions


 * What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic? NA
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects? Rated Start-class, Low-importance/ It is a part of Middle Ages, Visual arts, Bibles, Books and Kingdoms.
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class? They took sources from different types of information.

Overall impressions

 * Guiding questions


 * What is the article's overall status? State the information and source of the content.
 * What are the article's strengths? Very informative.
 * How can the article be improved? More images.
 * How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed? Sufficient but short of images, maybe the information about this content is not much or not widely public.

Optional activity

 * Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback

with four tildes — ~


 * Link to feedback: