User:Hockettc30/Vilabouly Complex, Laos/SamTyler526 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Pierson.evan, Rileymccormick, Chockett30


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Hockettc30/Vilabouly_Complex%2C_Laos?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * NA

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Your introduction paragraph was very nice on the details and information, but I think it could be re-written in a way that laid out the information a little more clearly.

The geography of the site line, doesn't make a whole lot of sense, but I'm sure this is just a jumping off point and will cleared up when you actually start working more heavily on the page. The materials part looks good as a base, but I would recommend putting the bronze section by the bronze alloy section, those two just seem to go together. The evidence of mining section looks like it should be super interesting, I would focus on that section a little extra. The similar sites section also seems very interesting, if the other sites can be used as confirming evidence for the theories from your site, that would be even better. The citations look good as well, although someone might have an issue with it all being bolded. Lastly, the overall tone seems very professional and will set you up for success for the final project rating