User:Hockeyman777/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Evolution of human intelligence

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I am a psychology major and I feel like knowing more about how humans evolved intellectually will help me understand more about the human brain.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

I felt like the article contained a very impressive collection of data. However, I did not understand why the last section discussing "Nutritional Status" related to the topic. Even in the first sentence of the second paragraph states "There is no direct evidence of the role of nutrition in the evolution of intelligence dating back to Homo erectus, contrary to dominant narratives in paleontology that link meat-eating to the appearance of modern human features such as a larger brain." Why bother including the paragraph then?

I feel as though the tone throughout is consistent and neutral. I did not feel like there was any bias that existed in the article. I felt as though all I was reading was factual information.

I did notice a couple of the links attached to the article no longer worked. I feel as though all of the sources being cited in this article are credible and diverse.

The talk page for this article is full of revisions and highlights support Wikipedia has done related to the topic of the article.