User:Hogyuchoi93/Catecholamine/E razo0821 Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? Hogyuchoi93
 * Link to draft you're reviewing:Catecholamine

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? no
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?no
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?no
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? yes, lead is just giving a description of catecholamine it self . It does not give an introduction of content. I think description could have its own category under content section and lead should give a brief summary of content information.
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? lead is over detailed regarding description of catecholamine. needs to be more concise.

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic? yes
 * Is the content added up-to-date? yes both sources are recent.
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?No, but I think citation of sources needs to be more specific. both sources are just added to the end of section next to each other. not sure what information was obtained from each.

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral? Yes
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? no
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? new content seems to be disconnected to the rest of the article. If an introduction of how its relevant to the rest is stated in lead paragraph, information added will make more sense to reader.
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? no its neutral

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? yes
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? yes
 * Are the sources current? yes both recent.
 * Check a few links. Do they work? yes

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? some sentences are hard to understand, but again im an ESL student. it might just be me.
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? no
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? yes and no. I would suggest to move why tests are done, followed by methods of testing.

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? yes
 * Are images well-captioned? yes
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?yes
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way? yes

For New Articles Only
If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.


 * Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject?
 * How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject?
 * Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles?
 * Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable?

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete? yes
 * What are the strengths of the content added? the importance of testing for tumors and how they relate to catecholamine
 * How can the content added be improved? lead intro paragraph needs to describe content of article, current info can be placed in its own category.

Overall evaluation
Good job!! My only advise is to make sure you add a description of content added to initial paragraph. that way the reader will have a little more information about content. I would also suggest to more sentences describing why testing is done before the actual description of the different test. I think it gives a little back ground information of why your information added is important and than describe the different tests.