User:Holmbejh4186/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Harm reduction

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
It is a topic that is growing in popularity and I want to make sure that wiki info is accurate

Evaluate the article
lead


 * first topic clearly defines topic
 * clearly defines where page is headed
 * very lengthy
 * some info not in rest of article

Tone and balance


 * neutral tone (especially for such a controversial topic)
 * no claims heavily towards one side or another

sources and references


 * mostly primary information
 * sources are current
 * some claims are uncited
 * sources are diverse with some leading towards one side others towards another
 * sources could be somewhat (a few cited news sources)

pictures


 * well captioned
 * enhance understanding of topic
 * one image looks like it was taken by a wikipedia user

organization


 * well organized
 * overall concise
 * no spelling errors

talk


 * lot's of talk about how to show how different countries and states have different Ideas on how to reduce harm
 * talks lot's on how to reduce harm
 * C class, mid importance, their is a wikiproject

Overall impressions


 * strengths: well organized, understandable, well written, stays neutral.
 * weakness: needs more citations and better citations
 * If the sources were better it would be a very good article. it describes the topic well and is the right length overall and gives the reader a great intro into the topic