User:Holyman17/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
(Provide a link to the article here.)

Medical malpractice in the United States

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

I choose the topic because people are being killed by medical errors every year, making it one of the leading cause of death in the world, after heart disease and cancer and also aspiring to go into medical line. This matters because missed, failed or wrong diagnoses are largely the result of inadequate medical assessment in patients.

My preliminary impression was that the concept of holding a physician accountable for medical malpractice was he earliest idea of mankind and they are reflected in ancient law.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

An enjoyable article on medical malpractices which lacked no section. here are my reasons.


 * I was excited that the lead section of the article did provide a concise overview of the topic, contained the introductory sentence which clearly described the topic and summarized the major sections of the article. I also double checked the information provided in the article by clicking on the external links provided in the article and found no false information.
 * A lot of important aspects of the topic were covered, as to as the content was relevant.it was up to date based on the statistics provided, no missing content were found and did address topics related to historically underrepresented populations.
 * The article was written in a neutral point of view and had no attempt to convince the reader in favor of any position or the other.
 * looking through the article, the source and references were current. Information provided was backed with facts and reliable secondary source which was written in my opinion diverse spectrum of authors because i checked a few links and they were all working.
 * The content of the article was sensibly organized into sections and the writing was clear, professional and easy to read. Reading through the article i found no grammatical or spelling errors.
 * I was bit disappointed to see that the article had no images to back up their facts and also help enhance the understanding of the topic.
 * This article was rated as B-Class on the project's quality scale.
 * In conclusion the article was a good one. the strength of the article was that it provided an overview of medical malpractice in the United States, and the judicial system developed to handle legal claims related to such.
 * One way i could improve this article is to perform some survey to show that the legal system is designed to encourage extensive discovery and negotiations between adversarial parties with the goal of resolving the dispute without going to jury trial
 * Finally this article was well-developed.