User:Hongnhungphan17/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Phosphorylation

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

This article introduces phosphorylation, one of the basic concepts in cell signaling and biochemistry. Phosphorylation is the process of attaching a phosphoryl group to modify activation or inactivation of most enzymes during biological processes. From my first impression, this article gave my a very general view of what phosphorylation is about. However, from the contents table, I knew that something was missing due to the fact that phosphorylation is a broad term and a regular process in multiple biological pathways.

Evaluate the article
One good thing about this article is a straightforward and easy-to-understand lead section introducing about phosphorylation. This is the most overview about what phosphorylation process does which is brief enough that I believe a non-expert would understand the concept.

The structure of the article is clear with several headings and subheadings, making it easy to follow and organized. Everything listed in the headings is straightforward and relevant to the article topic. However, there are multiple pathways of phosphorylation that should be added to this article, such as oxidative phosphorylation, photophosphorylation, and substrate-level phosphorylation. The details of the article were trivial which should be fixed with more details like specific pathways, enzymes catalyzed the phosphorylation, pictures illustrated the process, and so on.

The coverage is technical and neutral enough which emphasized facts and used neutral language, avoiding any bias or disagreement among different sources. In addition, the author used diverse and reliable sources to write this article, making it a more high-quality one. However, the author should look into more sources about phosphorylation to add more detailed information about the process.

In the talk page, the article was rated B-class. There were multiple comments on how the author could improve his or her article such as addition of pathways and information, English usage, old references, etc. The comments were not negative; instead, they were opinions which could help the author in improve the article in a better way.

Overall, this article has fair quality and might be helpful for beginners who want to know the definition of phosphorylation. The details or subheadings were not convincing enough with necessary information that the author would need to work on that. From my perspectives, this article is fairly developed and has not reached its completeness that I think should be improved in multiple criteria.